Prompt
Can you help me choose a vector database for a document search app that needs keyword search, metadata filters, and low latency?
Latest observation
Yes — for a document search app with keyword search, metadata filters, and low latency, the best choice often depends on whether you want a single system or a hybrid architecture.
What you need
Your requirements imply:
- Keyword search: full-text / BM25-style search
- Metadata filters: structured filtering on fields like date, author, category, tenant, etc.
- Low latency: fast retrieval for interactive search
- Likely also vector semantic search if you're using embeddings
Best options by approach
1) Elasticsearch / OpenSearch
Best if keyword search is a first-class requirement.
Pros
- Excellent keyword/full-text search
- Strong metadata filtering
- Supports vector search too
- Mature ranking, analyzers, faceting, highlighting
- Good for hybrid search (keyword + vector)
Cons
- More operational complexity
- Vector search is good, but not always as simple or specialized as dedicated vector DBs
- Can be heavier and costlier at scale
Use if
- You need strong traditional search plus vector search in one engine
- Search relevance matters a lot
- You want production-proven filtering and indexing
2) Postgres + pgvector
Best if your dataset is moderate and you want simplicity.
Pros
- Easy if you already use PostgreSQL
- Metadata filters are straightforward
- Good transactional consistency
- Can combine SQL filtering with vector search
- Lower operational burden
Cons
- Keyword search is weaker unless you build on Postgres full-text search
- Not ideal for very high scale or ultra-low latency search workloads
- Hybrid ranking is more manual
Use if
- You want fewer moving parts
- Your document corpus is not enormous
- You’re okay with “good enough” search rather than best-in-class retrieval
3) Qdrant
Best if vector search is primary and you still need solid filtering.
Pros
- Very fast vector search
- Excellent payload/metadata filtering
- Simple API and easy to operate
- Good performance/latency
- Great for hybrid retrieval patterns when paired with a text search engine
Cons
- Not a full keyword search engine
- You’ll typically pair it with Elasticsearch/OpenSearch or another text search layer for keyword search
Use if
- Your app is semantic-search heavy
- You need low latency + metadata filtering
- You’re fine using a second system for keyword search
4) Weaviate
Best if you want hybrid search with a developer-friendly platform.
Pros
- Vector + keyword/hybrid search support
- Metadata filtering
- Easier to get started than Elasticsearch in some cases
- Good for document apps
Cons
- Operational/maturity tradeoffs compared with Elasticsearch
- Depending on setup, may be less flexible for advanced keyword search use cases
Use if
- You want a simpler hybrid-search experience
- You like an all-in-one vector-first system
5) Pinecone
Best if you want managed vector search and minimal ops.
Pros
- Strong low-latency vector search
- Managed service
- Metadata filtering
- Scales well
Cons
- Not a keyword search engine
- You’ll still need something else for full-text keyword search
Use if
- You want managed vector infrastructure
- Your keyword search needs are handled elsewhere
My recommendation
If keyword search is essential:
Choose Elasticsearch or OpenSearch.
That gives you:
- strong keyword search
- metadata filters
- low latency
- vector/hybrid search support
If semantic search is primary and keyword search is secondary:
Choose Qdrant or Pinecone, and pair with OpenSearch/Elasticsearch for keyword search.
If you want simplicity and smaller scale:
Choose Postgres + pgvector.
Simple decision rule
- Need best keyword search? → Elasticsearch/OpenSearch
- Need best vector search with filtering? → Qdrant
- Need managed vector DB? → Pinecone
- Need easiest single-database setup with existing SQL stack? → Postgres + pgvector
- Want hybrid search with decent UX and less setup than Elastic? → Weaviate
Practical architecture suggestion
For a document search app, a common pattern is:
- OpenSearch/Elasticsearch for:
- keyword search
- filters
- faceting
- Qdrant/Pinecone for:
- semantic vector retrieval
- then merge/rerank results in your app
This is often the best balance of relevance + latency + flexibility.
If you want, I can also give you:
- a shortlist by scale/budget, or
- a side-by-side comparison table of the top 4 choices.