Prompt

Can you help me choose an auth provider for a web app that needs passwordless login, MFA, and account recovery?

Technology / Identity & Access1 observationLast seen Oct 6, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 6, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Yes — I can help.

For a web app needing passwordless login, MFA, and account recovery, the main options usually fall into two buckets:

Good managed providers

  • Auth0

    • Strong feature set: passwordless, MFA, recovery, social login, enterprise SSO.
    • Very flexible, but can get expensive as usage grows.
    • Good if you want maximum capability and don’t mind vendor lock-in / cost.
  • Clerk

    • Very developer-friendly and fast to integrate.
    • Supports passwordless, MFA, user management, and account recovery workflows.
    • Great for modern web apps; less enterprise-heavy than Auth0.
  • Firebase Authentication

    • Solid for passwordless and basic auth needs.
    • MFA support exists, but recovery and advanced auth workflows are less polished than Auth0/Clerk.
    • Best if you’re already in the Google/Firebase ecosystem.
  • Stytch

    • Strong passwordless-first auth, MFA, and recovery.
    • Good modern API-first choice.
    • Worth considering if you want auth as a service without the Auth0 complexity.
  • WorkOS

    • Excellent for enterprise auth/SSO, but not usually the first choice for consumer passwordless auth.
    • Better if you expect enterprise customers later.

If you want open-source / more control

  • Keycloak

    • Powerful and self-hostable.
    • Supports MFA, recovery flows, and more, but more operational overhead.
    • Better for teams that want control and can handle maintenance.
  • Supabase Auth

    • Good if you already use Supabase.
    • Passwordless support is decent; MFA and recovery are improving but may be less mature than Auth0/Clerk.

My short recommendation

  • Best overall for most web apps: Clerk or Auth0
  • Best if you want passwordless-first and a modern API: Stytch
  • Best if you want self-hosted control: Keycloak
  • Best if you’re already on Firebase: Firebase Auth

What matters most in choosing

  1. Passwordless method
    • Magic links vs OTP vs passkeys
  2. MFA support
    • TOTP, SMS, WebAuthn/passkeys, backup codes
  3. Account recovery
    • Recovery codes, verified email/phone fallback, support flows
  4. User experience
    • Hosted vs embedded UI, customization, passkeys support
  5. Cost and scale
  6. Compliance / enterprise needs
    • SSO, SCIM, audit logs, organization support

If you want, I can make this more concrete by giving you a comparison table of Auth0 vs Clerk vs Stytch vs Firebase vs Keycloak, or I can recommend one based on your stack (e.g. React/Next.js, Django, Rails, etc.).

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.