Can you recommend a collaborative whiteboard for stakeholder alignment sessions in a brand consultancy?

Yes — for stakeholder alignment sessions in a brand consultancy, I’d recommend Miro as the strongest all-around collaborative whiteboard.

Why Miro fits brand consultancy work

• Great for workshops: Built for facilitation, brainstorming, journey mapping, positioning exercises, and sticky-note clustering.
• Easy for stakeholders: Non-designers usually pick it up quickly.
• Templates for strategy work: Useful for brand audits, empathy maps, SWOTs, value proposition canvases, customer journeys, and alignment exercises.
• Strong collaboration: Real-time editing, voting, comments, and remote session support.
• Good export/share options: Helpful when you need to turn workshop outputs into decks or client-facing deliverables.

Good alternatives depending on your needs

• FigJam — Best if your team already lives in Figma and you want a lighter, more playful whiteboard experience.
• Mural — Very strong for structured facilitation and enterprise workshops; often favored for larger stakeholder groups.
• Microsoft Whiteboard — Fine for simpler sessions, especially if your clients are deep in Microsoft 365, but it’s less robust for consulting-style workshop flows.

My practical recommendation

If your sessions are:

• client-facing, workshop-heavy, and strategy-oriented → Miro
• design-adjacent and already in the Figma ecosystem → FigJam
• large, formal, enterprise stakeholder sessions → Mural

If you want, I can also give you a side-by-side comparison of Miro vs FigJam vs Mural specifically for brand strategy workshops.