Prompt
Can you recommend a feasibility software for prescreening questionnaire workflows and protocol-to-patient matching?
Latest observation
Yes — if you’re looking for feasibility software that supports pre-screening questionnaire workflows and protocol-to-patient matching, these are the strongest categories/options to evaluate:
Good options to consider
1. Clinerion
- Strong for patient matching and site feasibility.
- Uses real-world data to identify eligible patients against protocol criteria.
- Better suited when you want network-level matching and recruitment optimization.
2. Deep 6 AI
- Designed specifically for clinical trial patient matching using EHR data.
- Good for automated prescreening and matching patients to protocols.
- Often used by sites and health systems.
3. TriNetX
- Very strong for feasibility analysis and patient cohort discovery.
- Good for assessing whether a protocol is feasible across populations/sites.
- More focused on research network feasibility than workflow-heavy prescreening questionnaires, though it can support those use cases.
4. Castor EDC / Castor pre-screening tools
- Useful if you want a more workflow-based questionnaire prescreening setup.
- Good for collecting structured pre-screen data and routing patients.
- Less of a pure feasibility engine, more of a data capture + screening workflow tool.
5. Medidata / other EDC platforms with recruitment modules
- Some enterprise clinical trial platforms offer pre-screening forms, protocol feasibility, and recruitment workflows.
- Good if you want something integrated with broader CTMS/EDC operations.
6. vClinical / patient matching vendors
- Depending on your site network, some smaller vendors provide:
- questionnaire-based prescreening
- eligibility rule engines
- protocol-to-patient matching
- These can be good if you need customization rather than a large network product.
How to choose
If your priority is:
- Automated protocol-to-patient matching from EHR data → Deep 6 AI or Clinerion
- Feasibility and cohort counts across a network → TriNetX
- Questionnaire-driven prescreen workflow → Castor or a workflow tool integrated with your EHR/CRM
- Enterprise clinical trial operations with integrated screening → Medidata or similar enterprise suite
Questions to ask vendors
When evaluating, ask:
- Can it support both questionnaire-based prescreening and EHR-driven matching?
- Does it allow custom eligibility criteria mapping from protocol to patient data?
- Can it handle site workflows and referral tracking?
- Does it integrate with your EHR, CTMS, EDC, or CRM?
- How are privacy/consent handled for pre-screening?
- Can non-technical staff build and update questionnaires?
My practical recommendation
If you want a platform specifically for protocol-to-patient matching, start with:
- Deep 6 AI
- TriNetX
- Clinerion
If you want a strong pre-screen questionnaire workflow with less emphasis on advanced AI matching:
- Castor or a workflow-oriented research platform
If you want, I can also give you:
- a side-by-side comparison table of these tools, or
- a shortlist based on your setting (site, sponsor, CRO, hospital network, etc.).
Observation history
Unlock observation history
Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.