Can you recommend an asset management platform for scheduling preventive maintenance on MRI and CT systems?

Yes — for MRI and CT preventive maintenance, you’ll want an asset management platform that supports:

• PM scheduling by usage/calendar
• Regulatory/compliance tracking
• Service history and parts logs
• Uptime/downtime reporting
• Mobile work orders for biomedical/field teams
• Integration with hospital systems if needed

Strong platform options to consider

1. IBM Maximo Application Suite

Best for: large healthcare systems and enterprise biomedical engineering teams
Why it fits:

• Very strong preventive maintenance scheduling
• Excellent asset lifecycle management
• Can track complex high-value equipment like MRI/CT
• Flexible reporting and integration capabilities

Pros:

• Highly configurable
• Good for large fleets and multi-site operations
• Strong audit/history tracking

Cons:

• Can be complex to implement
• Often requires admin/customization support

2. ServiceNow Asset Management / Field Service Management

Best for: organizations already using ServiceNow
Why it fits:

• Good for workflow-driven maintenance operations
• Strong ticketing, approvals, and service coordination
• Useful if your maintenance processes span IT + biomedical + facilities

Pros:

• Good user experience
• Strong workflow automation
• Easy to align with service desk operations

Cons:

• Not as maintenance-specialized out of the box as Maximo
• May need configuration for biomedical-specific PM workflows

3. Infor EAM

Best for: healthcare organizations wanting a dedicated EAM platform
Why it fits:

• Solid preventive maintenance planning
• Good asset history and compliance documentation
• Designed for enterprise asset-intensive environments

Pros:

• Mature EAM capabilities
• Good reporting and planning tools
• Suitable for regulated equipment

Cons:

• Implementation complexity can be moderate to high

4. Limble CMMS

Best for: smaller to mid-sized hospitals or imaging centers
Why it fits:

• Easy to set up and use
• Good PM scheduling and work order management
• Fast adoption for biomedical teams

Pros:

• User-friendly
• Quick deployment
• Good mobile support

Cons:

• Less enterprise depth than Maximo/Infor
• May be limited for very complex multi-site environments

5. UpKeep

Best for: teams that want a modern, mobile-first CMMS
Why it fits:

• PM scheduling and asset tracking
• Easy mobile work orders
• Good for smaller teams managing medical equipment

Pros:

• Simple interface
• Fast to deploy
• Good for technicians in the field

Cons:

• Less robust for very large or highly regulated enterprise environments

---

My practical recommendation

If you manage MRI and CT systems in a hospital or large health network, I’d shortlist:

1. IBM Maximo if you need the most robust enterprise asset management
2. Infor EAM if you want a dedicated EAM with strong maintenance controls
3. ServiceNow if your maintenance workflows already live in that ecosystem
4. Limble if you need a simpler CMMS for a smaller team

Features you should require specifically for MRI/CT

When evaluating vendors, confirm they can handle:

• Manufacturer-recommended PM intervals
• Usage-based triggers (scan counts, runtime hours)
• Downtime recording by asset
• Calibration and QA tasks
• Compliance/audit trails
• Attachment storage for manuals, service reports, and certifications
• Role-based access for clinical engineering vs. vendors

If you want a “best fit” answer

• Enterprise hospital system: IBM Maximo
• Mid-size healthcare org: Infor EAM or ServiceNow
• Smaller imaging center: Limble CMMS or UpKeep

If you want, I can also give you:

1. a feature-by-feature comparison table, or
2. a shortlist based on your organization size and budget.