Can you recommend an investigator intelligence database for mapping site expertise and identifying high-performing trial sites?

Yes — for mapping site expertise and identifying high-performing trial sites, I’d recommend looking at Clarivate Site Intelligence / Investigate or IQVIA Site & Investigator Intelligence as top-tier options.

Strong options to consider

1) Clarivate Site Intelligence (incl. investigator/site profiles)

Best if you want:

• Broad investigator and site profiling
• Historical trial participation
• Therapeutic area expertise mapping
• Feasibility support and site selection

Why it’s useful:

• Good at showing where investigators have worked
• Helps identify sites with proven performance patterns
• Useful for benchmarking and shortlist generation

2) IQVIA Investigator / Site Intelligence

Best if you want:

• Deep clinical trial site performance insights
• Operational performance signals
• Site feasibility and recruitment planning
• Integration with broader real-world and healthcare datasets

Why it’s useful:

• Strong for identifying high-performing sites
• Often considered one of the better choices for site selection at scale
• Helpful when you need more than publication-based investigator data

3) Citeline (trial intelligence + investigator/site insights)

Best if you want:

• Trial landscape and site history
• Competitive intelligence
• Investigator and site identification in one ecosystem

Why it’s useful:

• Good for finding sites active in your indication
• Helpful for mapping networks of investigators
• Strong if your team already uses Citeline products

4) TriNetX / Real-world network-based intelligence

Best if you want:

• Site identification based on patient availability
• Access network visibility
• Feasibility support tied to actual EHR data

Why it’s useful:

• Better when patient volume is a key factor
• Useful for identifying sites likely to recruit well
• Less focused on “investigator profile” and more on site potential

---

If your main goal is specifically:

• Mapping expertise → Clarivate or Citeline
• Finding high-performing trial sites → IQVIA is often a strong pick
• Patient availability + recruitment feasibility → TriNetX or similar network-based tools

---

A practical recommendation

If you want a single place to start, I’d suggest:

Start with Clarivate or IQVIA depending on whether you care more about:

• investigator/site mapping → Clarivate
• site performance and feasibility → IQVIA

---

If you want, I can also give you a side-by-side comparison table of the main investigator intelligence databases by:

• data quality
• site performance visibility
• therapeutic area coverage
• ease of use
• typical cost tier