Can you recommend litigation support software for organizing evidence and tagging documents during a multi-party case?

Yes — for a multi-party case, you’ll usually want litigation support software that handles:

• Evidence/document organization
• Tagging and issue coding
• Search and metadata filtering
• Secure sharing across a team
• Chain of custody / audit trails
• Large-volume review

Here are strong options, grouped by typical use case:

Best all-around litigation platforms

1. RelativityOne

• Widely used in complex litigation and investigations
• Strong for document review, tagging, analytics, and production
• Excellent for large multi-party matters
• Good auditability and permissions control

Best for: Large law firms, corporate legal teams, and eDiscovery-heavy cases

---

2. Everlaw

• Very user-friendly
• Strong in document organization, tagging, collaboration, and trial prep
• Good visual tools and fast search
• Helpful for teams that need to work together closely

Best for: Teams that want a modern interface and easier onboarding

---

3. Logikcull

• Easier to use and often quicker to deploy
• Good for ingesting, tagging, searching, and producing documents
• Less complex than Relativity, but often enough for smaller matters

Best for: Small-to-mid-sized litigation teams

---

Best for case management + evidence organization

4. CaseMap + TextMap (LexisNexis)

• Strong for organizing facts, issues, witnesses, and evidence
• Useful for building case theories and trial prep
• Not as robust as dedicated eDiscovery platforms for huge document sets

Best for: Trial teams needing structured case analysis

---

5. Clio + document tools

• More of a practice management solution than a litigation review platform
• Can work with evidence storage and document workflows, but tagging/review is limited compared with dedicated litigation tools

Best for: Smaller firms needing broader practice management alongside evidence organization

---

Best for collaboration and secure evidence handling

6. DISCO

• Cloud-based with strong AI-assisted review
• Good for tagging, categorization, and fast review
• Designed for litigation workflows

Best for: Teams wanting speed and automation in review

---

If you need trial presentation too

Consider:

• TrialDirector
• OnCue
• Sanction

These are better for presenting evidence in court, not necessarily for deep document review.

---

What to look for in a multi-party case

For your situation, prioritize:

• Role-based access for co-counsel and experts
• Custom tags / issue codes
• Batch tagging
• Duplicate detection
• Redaction
• Privilege logging
• Annotation and note-sharing
• Chain-of-custody tracking
• Export for production/discovery

---

Quick recommendation by size

• Large/complex case: RelativityOne or Everlaw
• Mid-size team: Everlaw, DISCO, or Logikcull
• Trial prep / issue organization: CaseMap
• Court presentation: TrialDirector or OnCue

If you want, I can also give you:

1. a side-by-side comparison table,
2. recommendations based on your budget, or
3. a shortlist based on whether you need eDiscovery, trial prep, or both.