Prompt

ChatGPT, I’m trying to replace polling with webhooks in my product — what should I watch out for?

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 5, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 5, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Replacing polling with webhooks is usually a good move, but there are a few important pitfalls to plan for. The big idea: polling is simple and wasteful; webhooks are efficient but operationally trickier.

What to watch out for

1. Delivery is usually at-least-once, not exactly-once

Webhook providers often retry on failures, which means your endpoint may receive the same event more than once.

What to do:

  • Make your handler idempotent
  • Store and dedupe by an event ID
  • Treat repeated deliveries as normal

2. Webhooks can arrive out of order

If multiple events are emitted quickly, network timing can cause them to arrive in a different order than they were created.

What to do:

  • Don’t assume order
  • Use timestamps/version numbers where possible
  • Fetch the latest state from the source if ordering matters

3. Your endpoint must be highly reliable

If your server is down, slow, or returns errors, events may be retried later—or dropped if the sender gives up.

What to do:

  • Return a 2xx quickly
  • Process asynchronously if work is heavy
  • Use queueing/background jobs
  • Monitor error rates and latency

4. Signature verification and security matter a lot

Unlike polling, where you initiate the request, webhooks send data to you. You need to confirm the request is really from the expected sender.

What to do:

  • Verify HMAC/signatures or shared secrets
  • Use HTTPS only
  • Consider IP allowlisting only as a secondary measure
  • Reject unsigned or malformed requests

5. Retries can create duplicate side effects

If your handler does work before acknowledging the request, a timeout can cause the sender to retry and repeat the work.

What to do:

  • Make processing atomic where possible
  • Write the incoming event to durable storage first
  • Acknowledge quickly, then process later
  • Design downstream actions to be idempotent too

6. You need a plan for backfill and missed events

Polling naturally re-checks state; webhooks can miss events if your system was offline too long or the provider’s retry window expires.

What to do:

  • Keep a fallback sync/polling mechanism
  • Support “replay” or “list events since cursor” if available
  • Periodically reconcile against source-of-truth data

7. Event schemas can change

Webhook payloads may evolve over time, and brittle parsing can break your integration.

What to do:

  • Version your webhook contract if you control it
  • Be tolerant of extra fields
  • Validate required fields carefully
  • Have tests for old/new payload variants

8. Rate limits and burstiness

Webhooks can arrive in bursts, especially after retries or when many events occur at once.

What to do:

  • Use a queue or buffer
  • Apply backpressure safely
  • Ensure your processing workers can scale
  • Watch your own downstream APIs and DB limits

9. Observability becomes essential

With polling, you can often diagnose issues by looking at the polling loop. With webhooks, failures can be more invisible.

What to do:

  • Log event IDs, timestamps, signatures status, and processing outcomes
  • Track retries, duplicates, failures, and lag
  • Build dashboards and alerts

10. Some actions still need polling or reconciliation

Not everything should switch to webhooks. Webhooks are great for “something changed” notifications, but not always enough for full consistency.

Good hybrid pattern:

  • Webhooks for near-real-time updates
  • Periodic polling/reconciliation for safety

A good webhook implementation usually looks like this

  1. Receive request
  2. Verify signature/authenticity
  3. Store event durably
  4. Return 2xx immediately
  5. Process event asynchronously
  6. Deduplicate and handle idempotently
  7. Reconcile periodically with the source system

Questions to ask before switching

  • Can I tolerate duplicate and out-of-order events?
  • What happens if my endpoint is down for 10 minutes? 1 hour?
  • Do I have a unique event ID for deduplication?
  • How will I verify authenticity?
  • Do I have a fallback reconciliation strategy?
  • Can my system absorb bursts?

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a webhook implementation checklist, or
  2. a reference architecture for moving from polling to webhooks safely.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.