Prompt

ChatGPT, I need a simple way to receive Stripe and GitHub webhooks, validate them, and forward certain events to internal queues.

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 5, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 5, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A simple, reliable pattern is:

  1. Expose one small webhook service
  2. Verify signatures from each provider
  3. Normalize the event
  4. Publish only the events you care about to internal queues

Recommended setup

1) Webhook endpoint

Create a single HTTP service with two endpoints:

  • POST /webhooks/stripe
  • POST /webhooks/github

Keep it minimal:

  • read raw request body
  • verify provider signature
  • parse event
  • enqueue internal job/message
  • return 2xx fast

2) Signature validation

Stripe

Use Stripe’s signing secret and validate with the raw body and Stripe-Signature header.

Typical flow:

  • receive raw payload
  • call Stripe signature verification
  • if valid, process event.type

GitHub

Use a shared webhook secret and validate:

  • X-Hub-Signature-256 header
  • HMAC SHA-256 of the raw body

Reject if signature is missing or invalid.

3) Event filtering

Only forward the events you need.

Examples:

  • Stripe: payment_intent.succeeded, invoice.paid, charge.refunded
  • GitHub: push, pull_request, workflow_run

4) Internal queue forwarding

After validation:

  • map event to an internal message format
  • push to a queue like SQS, RabbitMQ, Redis streams, Kafka, or your job runner
  • include:
    • provider
    • event type
    • event id
    • timestamp
    • raw payload or normalized payload

5) Operational details

Add:

  • idempotency/deduplication using Stripe event ID / GitHub delivery ID
  • logging of event IDs and verification failures
  • retries on queue publish failure
  • dead-letter queue for malformed/unhandled events

Minimal architecture

Stripe/GitHub → Webhook API → Verify → Filter → Queue → Internal consumers


Example behavior

Stripe

If event is:

  • payment_intent.succeeded → send to payments.queue
  • otherwise ignore or log

GitHub

If event is:

  • push to main → send to deployments.queue
  • pull_request opened → send to review.queue

Implementation hint

Use a framework that gives access to the raw request body, because signature validation depends on it.

Good choices:

  • Node.js: Express/Fastify
  • Python: FastAPI/Flask
  • Go: net/http
  • Rust: Axum/Actix

If you want the simplest possible production approach

Use:

  • one webhook microservice
  • Stripe SDK for verification
  • HMAC verification for GitHub
  • SQS or RabbitMQ for queues
  • Redis/Postgres for deduplication

If you want, I can provide a working sample in Node.js, Python, or Go with:

  • Stripe validation
  • GitHub validation
  • queue publishing
  • event filtering

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.