Prompt

crawl websites at scale

Technology / Cloud Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 4, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 4, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Crawling websites at scale is doable, but the right approach depends on your goal: search indexing, price monitoring, lead gen, ML data collection, or site auditing.

Core architecture

A scalable crawler usually has these components:

  1. URL frontier

    • Stores URLs to visit
    • Deduplicates
    • Prioritizes by domain, freshness, depth, or importance
  2. Fetcher workers

    • Distributed workers that download pages
    • Respect rate limits and robots.txt if required
    • Retry transient failures
  3. Parser/extractor

    • Extracts links, metadata, structured data, text, assets
    • Normalizes URLs and canonicalizes content
  4. Storage

    • Raw HTML in object storage
    • Parsed data in a database/search index
    • Metadata and crawl state in a fast key-value store
  5. Scheduler

    • Decides what to crawl next
    • Enforces per-domain politeness
    • Handles recrawl intervals and backoff
  6. Monitoring

    • Throughput, error rates, bans, latency, queue size
    • Domain-level health and dead-letter queues

Key scaling principles

  • Partition by domain or host to enforce politeness and simplify rate limiting
  • Use async I/O for high connection concurrency
  • Keep fetchers stateless; store crawl state centrally
  • Deduplicate aggressively
    • URL normalization
    • Content hashing
    • Canonical link handling
  • Back off on errors
    • 429/403/5xx handling
    • Adaptive per-host throttling
  • Prioritize valuable URLs first
  • Support retries and idempotency
  • Use a queue-based pipeline so each stage can scale independently

Common tech stack

  • Queue/frontier: Kafka, RabbitMQ, Redis Streams, SQS, or custom sharded frontier
  • Workers: Go, Python asyncio, Rust, Java
  • Storage:
    • S3/GCS for raw pages
    • Postgres/MySQL for metadata at smaller scale
    • Cassandra/Bigtable/DynamoDB for large-scale state
    • Elasticsearch/OpenSearch for indexed content
  • Parsing: BeautifulSoup/lxml, trafilatura, readability, Playwright for JS-heavy sites
  • Orchestration: Kubernetes, ECS, Nomad

Important considerations

  • Legal/ethical

    • Check robots.txt where appropriate
    • Respect ToS and copyright restrictions
    • Avoid abusive request rates
    • Identify your crawler with a user agent and contact info if possible
  • Dynamic sites

    • Use headless browsers selectively; they’re expensive
    • Prefer HTTP fetch + HTML parsing when possible
  • Politeness

    • Limit concurrency per domain
    • Randomize delays
    • Avoid hammering the same origin
  • Data quality

    • Normalize encodings and languages
    • Detect duplicate/spam pages
    • Track fetch time and HTTP status for freshness

Simple scaling pattern

A good baseline design:

  • One seed loader adds starting URLs
  • A distributed frontier stores (normalized_url, priority, next_fetch_time)
  • Many fetcher workers pull eligible URLs
  • Each fetched page emits:
    • raw HTML to object storage
    • extracted links back to frontier
    • metadata to the database
  • A recrawl scheduler re-enqueues pages based on change frequency

If you want to build this

I can help you with any of these next:

  1. a reference architecture
  2. a Python/Go crawler skeleton
  3. a distributed design with Redis/Kafka/SQS
  4. a polite crawler with rate limiting and robots.txt
  5. a site-specific scraping setup for JS-heavy pages

If you want, I can draft a concrete architecture for 10k, 1M, or 100M pages/day.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.