Prompt
Do I need retries and backoff in a crawler?
Latest observation
Oct 4, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
Yes — in most crawlers, retries with backoff are strongly recommended.
Why
Crawling the web is noisy and failure-prone:
- Transient network issues: timeouts, DNS hiccups, connection resets
- Server-side throttling: 429, 503, temporary bans
- Intermittent upstream failures: pages that fail once and succeed on retry
Without retries, you’ll lose data and waste crawl budget. Without backoff, you can accidentally make problems worse by hammering a struggling site.
What to retry
Typically retry on:
- 5xx responses: 500, 502, 503, 504
- 429 Too Many Requests
- Network exceptions: timeouts, connection errors, temporary TLS issues
Usually avoid retrying on:
- 4xx client errors like 404, 403, 400
- Permanent parsing failures
- Invalid URLs
How to back off
Use exponential backoff with jitter:
- First retry after a short delay
- Increase delay each attempt
- Add random jitter so many crawler workers don’t retry in sync
Example pattern:
- Retry 1: 1s
- Retry 2: 2s
- Retry 3: 4s
- Retry 4: 8s
- Add randomness around each delay
Best practices
- Keep retries limited, e.g. 2–5 attempts
- Use per-host rate limiting
- Respect robots.txt and crawl-delay if applicable
- Set timeouts so hung requests don’t stall workers
- Log retry reasons and final failures
Caveat
For a crawler that hits a very large number of mostly static pages, you may want different retry policies by error type:
- Network/5xx: retry
- 429: retry with longer backoff
- 404: no retry
- 403: maybe retry once, but often treat as blocked
If you want, I can also suggest a simple retry/backoff policy for a crawler in Python, Go, or Node.