Prompt

Do I need retries and backoff in a crawler?

Technology / Cloud Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 4, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 4, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Yes — in most crawlers, retries with backoff are strongly recommended.

Why

Crawling the web is noisy and failure-prone:

  • Transient network issues: timeouts, DNS hiccups, connection resets
  • Server-side throttling: 429, 503, temporary bans
  • Intermittent upstream failures: pages that fail once and succeed on retry

Without retries, you’ll lose data and waste crawl budget. Without backoff, you can accidentally make problems worse by hammering a struggling site.

What to retry

Typically retry on:

  • 5xx responses: 500, 502, 503, 504
  • 429 Too Many Requests
  • Network exceptions: timeouts, connection errors, temporary TLS issues

Usually avoid retrying on:

  • 4xx client errors like 404, 403, 400
  • Permanent parsing failures
  • Invalid URLs

How to back off

Use exponential backoff with jitter:

  • First retry after a short delay
  • Increase delay each attempt
  • Add random jitter so many crawler workers don’t retry in sync

Example pattern:

  • Retry 1: 1s
  • Retry 2: 2s
  • Retry 3: 4s
  • Retry 4: 8s
  • Add randomness around each delay

Best practices

  • Keep retries limited, e.g. 2–5 attempts
  • Use per-host rate limiting
  • Respect robots.txt and crawl-delay if applicable
  • Set timeouts so hung requests don’t stall workers
  • Log retry reasons and final failures

Caveat

For a crawler that hits a very large number of mostly static pages, you may want different retry policies by error type:

  • Network/5xx: retry
  • 429: retry with longer backoff
  • 404: no retry
  • 403: maybe retry once, but often treat as blocked

If you want, I can also suggest a simple retry/backoff policy for a crawler in Python, Go, or Node.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.