Prompt

Help me find a benchmark dataset for evaluating a search ranking model

Technology / Data Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 16, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 16, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Here are some widely used benchmark datasets for evaluating search ranking / learning-to-rank models, depending on your task:

Classic benchmark datasets

  1. MS MARCO

    • Very popular for passage/document ranking and semantic search.
    • Large-scale, real user queries with relevance judgments.
    • Good for modern neural rankers and retrieval + reranking.
  2. TREC Deep Learning (TREC DL)

    • Based on MS MARCO with additional high-quality relevance judgments.
    • Excellent for evaluating ranking quality more rigorously than MS MARCO alone.
  3. LETOR family

    • Classic learning-to-rank benchmark datasets.
    • Includes MQ2007, MQ2008, etc.
    • Good for traditional rankers and feature-based models.
  4. MSLR-WEB10K / MSLR-WEB30K

    • Large benchmark datasets from Microsoft.
    • Widely used in academic ranking research.
    • Good when you want standard LTR evaluation with many query-document pairs.

Other useful datasets

  1. ClueWeb09 / ClueWeb12

    • Web-scale datasets used with TREC tracks.
    • More realistic but harder to work with.
  2. ANTIQUE

    • Question-answer search dataset.
    • Useful if your search model is for answer retrieval or QA-style queries.
  3. BEIR benchmark

    • A collection of many retrieval datasets across domains.
    • Great if you want to test generalization across tasks rather than one fixed benchmark.

Choosing one

  • If you want a modern default benchmark: MS MARCO + TREC DL
  • If you want a classic LTR benchmark: MSLR-WEB10K
  • If you want out-of-domain robustness: BEIR
  • If you want small, standard academic datasets: LETOR (MQ2007/MQ2008)

If you want, I can also help you pick one based on:

  • pointwise / pairwise / listwise ranking
  • web search vs semantic search
  • small vs large dataset
  • Python/benchmark loader availability

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.