Prompt
How can I perform bulk data scraping across multiple websites simultaneously?
Latest observation
A sequential loop doesn't scale. A scraper spends most of its time waiting on network responses. Concurrency lets many requests stay in flight at once. In one example, five pages that each took a 2-second delay finished in about 3 seconds total.
Scale up through four approaches:
asyncio with aiohttp or httpx. For most cases, sources call this the best balance of speed and flexibility. You build a list of tasks and run them with asyncio.gather, then parse with BeautifulSoup or similar. A Semaphore caps how many requests run at once, and random short delays between requests make traffic less bursty.
Scrapy. A full framework built on the non-blocking Twisted engine. It has built-in concurrency settings, deduplication, URL filtering, and handling of logins, cookies and redirects. For several sites, you can run one spider per site (with Scrapyd, for example) and cap concurrency per domain or IP.
Multiprocessing plus asyncio. To use multiple CPU cores, split the URL list across processes and run an asyncio loop inside each one.
Distributed crawling. For very large jobs, a shared queue (Redis, or Redis plus Kafka in scrapy-cluster) feeds multiple worker instances, which you can scale horizontally with Docker Compose. Scrapy combined with scrapy-playwright covers JavaScript-heavy pages.
Managed queues are an alternative. Some services accept tens of thousands of URLs, crawl them concurrently, retry failures and send each result to a webhook you host, so you don't build the infrastructure yourself.
Newer AI-oriented crawlers exist. Crawl4AI is an async, open-source library with parallel crawling, JavaScript rendering and markdown output. It suits unstructured pages where writing CSS/XPath selectors would be fragile. Scrapy remains stronger for structured, high-volume crawling.
Per-site limits are the bottleneck. Servers often limit concurrent requests per IP, so raising your concurrency setting alone stops helping. The usual fix is rotating proxies, but the practical ceiling is what each target site can handle. Concurrency across many different domains is safer than hammering one.
Operational basics for bulk jobs:
Use a queue with retries and backoff.
Track state per URL (queued, done, failed) so a crash doesn't restart everything.
Deduplicate URLs and cache raw responses.
Log errors and monitor for layout changes.
Respect robots.txt and each site's rate limits, and follow their terms and privacy laws for any personal data.
Brands
Citations
- https://github.com/RahmaniErfan/distributed-web-crawler
- https://crawlbase.com/blog/scrape-multiple-websites-at-once/
- https://medium.com/@proxiesapi-com/making-your-web-crawling-project-blazingly-fast-d450fc661710
- https://dev.to/lewis_kerr_2d0d4c5b886b02/using-scrapy-a-simple-guide-to-web-scraping-54d3
- https://medium.com/@DataBeacon/speed-up-web-scraping-with-concurrency-in-python-9923e5d35a26
- https://gist.github.com/gustavorps/98a9b03143db24c5acedab343b7e7a55
- https://scrapfly.io/blog/what-is-asynchronous-web-scraping/
- https://www.zenrows.com/blog/speed-up-web-scraping-with-concurrency-in-python
- https://webscraping.fyi/lib/compare/python-crawl4ai-vs-python-scrapy/
- https://blog.eduonix.com/2026/07/python-asyncio-by-example-build-a-concurrent-web-scraper-from-scratch/