Prompt

How do I build a login flow with redirect URIs and consent screens?

Technology / Identity & Access1 observationLast seen Oct 6, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 6, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A solid login flow with redirect URIs and consent screens is usually built around OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect (OIDC). The safest and most common pattern for web/mobile apps is the Authorization Code flow with PKCE.

1) Core pieces

You typically have:

  • Client app: your website, mobile app, or SPA
  • Authorization server / Identity provider (IdP): handles login, consent, token issuance
  • Resource server / API: the backend API the app wants to call
  • Redirect URI: where the IdP sends the user back after login/consent

2) Recommended flow: Authorization Code + PKCE

High-level steps

  1. User clicks Log in
  2. Your app redirects the browser to the IdP’s /authorize endpoint
  3. User authenticates with the IdP
  4. IdP shows a consent screen if needed
  5. IdP redirects back to your redirect URI with an authorization code
  6. Your app exchanges that code for tokens at the IdP’s token endpoint
  7. Your app uses the access token to call APIs; if using OIDC, it also uses the ID token for user identity

3) Redirect URI setup

A redirect URI must be:

  • Pre-registered with the IdP
  • Exact match (scheme, host, path, and often query rules depending on provider)
  • Ideally a route dedicated to handling the callback, e.g.:
    • https://app.example.com/auth/callback
    • myapp://auth/callback for mobile apps

Why exact matching matters

This prevents attackers from intercepting authorization codes by sending users to malicious callback URLs.


4) Authorization request example

Your app sends the browser to something like:

GET /authorize?
  response_type=code&
  client_id=abc123&
  redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.example.com%2Fauth%2Fcallback&
  scope=openid%20profile%20email&
  state=randomState123&
  code_challenge=...&
  code_challenge_method=S256

Important parameters

  • response_type=code: use authorization code flow
  • client_id: your app’s public identifier
  • redirect_uri: where the user returns
  • scope: requested permissions
  • state: CSRF protection and request correlation
  • code_challenge / code_challenge_method: PKCE protection

5) Consent screen behavior

The consent screen shows the user:

  • Who is requesting access
  • What data/scopes are being requested
  • What app name/logo is being used
  • Potentially what actions the app can perform

When consent is shown

Usually when:

  • The app is requesting scopes the user hasn’t already approved
  • The user is first connecting the app
  • The IdP policy requires explicit consent

Best practices

  • Request only the scopes you truly need
  • Use human-readable scope names on the consent UI
  • Clearly show the app name and domain
  • Allow the user to deny consent without breaking account access

6) Callback handling

After login/consent, the IdP redirects to:

https://app.example.com/auth/callback?code=AUTH_CODE&state=randomState123

Your app should:

  1. Verify state matches what it originally generated
  2. Verify the callback came on an allowed redirect URI
  3. Exchange code for tokens using the token endpoint
  4. Store tokens securely
  5. Establish your app session

7) Token exchange example

Your backend sends:

POST /token
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

grant_type=authorization_code&
code=AUTH_CODE&
redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.example.com%2Fauth%2Fcallback&
client_id=abc123&
code_verifier=original_verifier

The IdP returns something like:

{
  "access_token": "eyJ...",
  "id_token": "eyJ...",
  "refresh_token": "def...",
  "expires_in": 3600,
  "token_type": "Bearer"
}

8) Session handling

After successful token exchange, you have two common options:

Option A: Server-side session

  • Create your own session cookie
  • Keep OAuth tokens on the server
  • Best for traditional web apps

Option B: Token-based frontend

  • Frontend stores/accesses tokens
  • Common in SPAs, but requires careful token handling
  • Prefer BFF (Backend for Frontend) patterns when possible

Security tips

  • Use HTTP-only, Secure, SameSite cookies for sessions
  • Avoid storing tokens in localStorage if you can
  • Use short-lived access tokens
  • Rotate refresh tokens when supported

9) Logout flow

If using OIDC:

  • Clear your app session
  • Optionally redirect to the IdP’s logout endpoint
  • Optionally pass a post-logout redirect URI (also pre-registered)

10) Security checklist

  • Use Authorization Code + PKCE
  • Validate state
  • Validate redirect_uri
  • Only allow exact, pre-registered callback URLs
  • Use HTTPS everywhere
  • Request minimal scopes
  • Protect against open redirects
  • Validate ID token signature, issuer, audience, expiration
  • Rotate and protect refresh tokens
  • Consider CSRF protection on session endpoints
  • Log auth events, but never secrets

11) Simple sequence diagram

User -> App: Click Login
App -> IdP: Redirect to /authorize
IdP -> User: Login / Consent screen
IdP -> App: Redirect to redirect_uri?code=...
App -> IdP: Exchange code for tokens
IdP -> App: Tokens
App -> User: Logged in session

12) If you’re building your own auth system

If you’re implementing the auth server yourself, you’ll need:

  • Client registration
  • Redirect URI allowlisting
  • Authorization code generation and storage
  • PKCE verification
  • Consent storage
  • Token issuance and signing
  • Session management
  • Revocation and logout
  • Audit logs

But unless you have a strong reason, it’s usually better to use an established IdP like:

  • Auth0
  • Okta
  • Azure AD / Entra ID
  • Google Identity Platform
  • Keycloak
  • Cognito

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a working example in Node/Express, Python, or Next.js, or
  2. a database schema for storing clients, redirect URIs, grants, and consent records.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.