Prompt
How do I build role-based access for SSO users?
Latest observation
To build role-based access for SSO users, you generally want to treat the SSO provider as the identity source and your app as the authorization source.
1) Separate authentication from authorization
- Authentication: “Who is the user?” → handled by SSO/SAML/OIDC.
- Authorization: “What can they do?” → handled by your app, based on roles/permissions.
Even if the identity provider can send roles/groups, your app should still define what those roles mean.
2) Decide where roles come from
Common patterns:
A. Roles assigned in your app
- After SSO login, you match the user by email, subject, or directory ID.
- Your app stores a role like
admin,editor,viewer. - Best when your app needs its own permission model.
B. Roles/groups sent by the IdP
- The IdP includes group/role claims in the token/assertion.
- Your app maps those claims to internal roles.
- Good for central IT-managed access control.
C. Hybrid approach
- IdP provides coarse groups like
Finance,HR,Engineering. - Your app converts those into app-specific permissions.
3) Use stable identifiers, not just email
For SSO users, email can change. Prefer:
subclaim in OIDC- SAML NameID or a persistent identifier
- Directory object ID / immutable user ID
Store a mapping like:
- external identity ID → internal user record
- internal user record → roles/permissions
4) Model access in your app
A simple model:
- User
- Role
- Permission
- UserRole
- RolePermission
Example:
admin→manage_users,view_reports,edit_settingsviewer→view_reports
For simpler apps, roles alone may be enough.
5) Provision users on first login
When a user logs in via SSO:
- Validate the SSO response/token.
- Look up user by immutable external ID.
- If new, create a local user record.
- Assign a default role.
- Apply mapped roles/groups from the IdP if available.
This is often called just-in-time provisioning.
6) Handle group/role mapping
If the IdP sends groups like:
app-adminsapp-editors
Map them to internal roles:
app-admins→adminapp-editors→editor
Keep this mapping configurable so you don’t hardcode IdP-specific logic.
7) Enforce authorization everywhere
Check roles/permissions:
- in the frontend for UI visibility
- in the backend for actual security enforcement
- at the API endpoint or service layer
Never rely only on frontend checks.
8) Plan for user lifecycle
You need rules for:
- user removed from IdP group
- user disabled in IdP
- role changes
- account deprovisioning
Typically, on every login or token refresh:
- re-sync roles/groups
- revoke access if no longer authorized
9) Log and audit
Track:
- login events
- role assignments
- permission changes
- denied access attempts
This helps with security reviews and troubleshooting.
10) Recommended implementation pattern
A common robust setup:
- SSO login via OIDC or SAML
- App receives identity claims
- App finds/creates local user
- App syncs external groups to internal roles
- App authorizes requests using internal permissions
- Periodic or login-time revalidation
Example flow
If a user logs in with SSO and the token contains:
sub = abc123email = jane@company.comgroups = ["finance-team", "app-admins"]
Your app might:
- create or update user
jane - map
app-adminstoadmin - map
finance-teamtobilling_viewer - issue your own session/JWT with internal roles included
Best practices
- Use least privilege by default.
- Prefer group-based assignment over manual per-user assignment at scale.
- Keep a local authorization layer even if the IdP sends roles.
- Use immutable IDs for identity matching.
- Make mappings configurable and auditable.
If you want, I can also give you:
- a database schema for this,
- an OIDC/SAML example flow, or
- sample code in Node, Python, or Java.