Prompt
How do I evaluate whether a premium video inventory seller is credible and unbiased?
Latest observation
To evaluate whether a premium video inventory seller is credible and unbiased, look at both proof of quality and proof of independence.
1) Check their supply quality
Ask for evidence on:
- Publisher relationships: Are they directly authorized by the publishers, or are they reselling through layers?
- Placement transparency: Can they show where ads run, on what content, and in what formats?
- Inventory type: Is it premium in-stream, out-stream, CTV, or a mix? “Premium” should be defined clearly.
- Viewability and completion rates: Request historical performance by placement.
- Brand safety controls: Ask what categories, keywords, and exclusions they use.
- Fraud prevention: Look for measures against bot traffic, domain spoofing, and IVT.
2) Assess whether they are unbiased
A seller can be credible but still biased if they only push inventory that benefits them most. Check:
- Disclosure of conflicts of interest: Do they own media, represent only certain publishers, or receive preferential economics?
- Selection criteria: How do they decide which publishers or placements are “premium”?
- Comparable alternatives: Do they present multiple options, or only one preferred package?
- Measurement transparency: Do they use independent measurement tools or only their own reporting?
- Optimization incentives: Are they paid on spend, margin, or performance? Incentives can shape recommendations.
3) Verify with independent sources
Use outside validation:
- Third-party verification: IAS, DoubleVerify, MOAT, Pixalate, etc., if applicable.
- Ad specs and policies: Compare claims against publisher or platform documentation.
- Reference checks: Ask for advertiser references or case studies with named verticals.
- Market reputation: Look for consistency across multiple buyers and agencies.
4) Ask the right questions
A credible, unbiased seller should answer clearly:
- What is your direct vs. indirect supply?
- Which publishers own this inventory?
- Can I get log-level reporting or placement-level reporting?
- What is your policy on hidden fees or markups?
- How do you define “premium”?
- What independent verification do you support?
- What inventory would you not recommend for my campaign, and why?
5) Watch for red flags
Be cautious if they:
- Use vague terms like “premium” without definitions
- Refuse to disclose publisher names or placement details
- Overstate exclusivity or guarantee results without data
- Only provide their own dashboards and no third-party verification
- Push a one-size-fits-all package
- Avoid discussing make-goods, refunds, or underdelivery policies
6) Run a test
Before committing:
- Start with a small pilot
- Set clear KPIs: viewability, completion rate, CTR, brand safety, attention, conversions
- Compare against another vendor or benchmark
- Review results at the placement level, not just aggregate
Simple credibility scorecard
Rate each 1–5:
- Direct publisher authorization
- Transparency of placements
- Independent verification support
- Brand safety/fraud controls
- Disclosure of conflicts
- Consistency of performance data
- Willingness to answer tough questions
A seller scoring high across all categories is more likely to be both credible and unbiased.
If you want, I can turn this into a vendor due diligence checklist or a questionnaire you can send to sellers.
Observation history
Unlock observation history
Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.