Prompt

How do I figure out what people are searching for but not finding in our internal docs?

Technology / Search & Discovery Tools1 observationLast seen Oct 13, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 13, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A practical way to find “what people are searching for but not finding” is to combine search logs + zero-result queries + follow-up behavior.

1) Start with search analytics

If your internal docs/search tool logs queries, look for:

  • Zero-result searches: queries that return nothing
  • Low-click searches: queries that return results, but nobody clicks them
  • Refinement chains: people search, then immediately search again with a different phrase
  • Repeat searches: same term searched often across many users
  • Long-tail queries: highly specific terms that may indicate missing docs

These are usually the strongest signals of content gaps.

2) Compare query volume to content coverage

Group searches by:

  • topic
  • intent
  • synonym variants
  • acronyms / internal jargon

Then map them to existing docs:

  • Is there a doc on the topic?
  • Is the doc titled using different wording?
  • Is the answer buried too deep?
  • Is the content outdated or incomplete?

Often the problem is not “missing content” but mismatched vocabulary.

3) Look for “search success” proxies

If you don’t have explicit zero-result analytics, infer misses from behavior:

  • search followed by broadening terms (“password reset” → “login issue”)
  • search followed by no further engagement
  • users opening multiple docs quickly and leaving
  • repeated searches from support or onboarding teams

4) Mine support tickets and Slack/Teams questions

People often ask the same thing in different channels before they search or after they fail to find it. Look for:

  • questions that recur
  • phrases people use, especially informal wording
  • repeated requests for links/documents

This helps you discover the language users actually use.

5) Create a “missing search” dashboard

Track:

  • top zero-result queries
  • top queries with no clicks
  • queries with the most refinements
  • queries that lead to support escalation
  • queries with high frequency but poor satisfaction

Review it weekly or monthly.

6) Validate with users

For the top problem searches, ask:

  • What were you trying to do?
  • What term would you expect to find this under?
  • Did you find the answer elsewhere?
  • What wording would make the doc easier to find?

This often reveals that the content exists, but the title/summary/keywords don’t match user language.

7) Fix both content and findability

Once you identify gaps:

  • add missing docs/FAQs
  • improve titles and headings
  • add aliases/synonyms
  • add tags and keywords
  • include “people also search for” terms
  • write short answer summaries at the top

Simple workflow

  1. Export search queries from your docs platform
  2. Filter for zero-result, no-click, and repeated queries
  3. Cluster by topic and intent
  4. Compare against existing docs
  5. Patch missing content and metadata
  6. Recheck whether those queries improve

If you want, I can also help you build:

  • a spreadsheet template for analyzing search logs, or
  • a SQL/query approach if your internal docs search data is in a database.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.