Prompt

How do I queue and retry large crawl jobs?

Technology / Cloud Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 4, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 4, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

To queue and retry large crawl jobs, the usual pattern is to make crawling asynchronous, chunked, and idempotent.

Recommended approach

1. Put crawl requests onto a queue

Instead of doing the crawl in the request/response path:

  • API receives crawl job request
  • Store a crawl_job record in a database
  • Enqueue a message like:
    • job_id
    • target URL / seed list
    • crawl parameters
    • attempt count

Workers then pull jobs from the queue and process them in the background.

Good queue options:

  • SQS
  • RabbitMQ
  • Redis Queue / Celery
  • Kafka for very high throughput
  • Cloud-native job runners like Cloud Tasks, Sidekiq, BullMQ, etc.

2. Break large crawls into smaller units

A “large crawl” should not be one giant job. Split it into:

  • seed jobs
  • page fetch jobs
  • discovery jobs for new URLs
  • content processing jobs

This lets you retry only the failed piece rather than the entire crawl.

Example:

  • Job A: crawl domain root
  • Job B: crawl discovered URLs batch 1
  • Job C: crawl discovered URLs batch 2

3. Make every crawl step idempotent

Retries will happen, so each worker should be safe to run more than once.

Use:

  • Unique job IDs
  • Deduplication keys per URL + crawl run
  • “Upsert” writes instead of inserts
  • A status table like:
    • pending
    • in_progress
    • completed
    • failed
    • retrying

If a page was already fetched successfully, retrying shouldn’t duplicate it.


4. Track attempts and failure reasons

Store metadata for each job:

  • attempt_count
  • last_error
  • next_retry_at
  • status
  • started_at
  • finished_at

This makes it easy to:

  • retry only transient failures
  • stop after max attempts
  • inspect problematic URLs

5. Use exponential backoff for retries

For transient failures like:

  • network timeouts
  • 429 rate limits
  • temporary 5xx responses

Retry with backoff:

  • 1 min
  • 5 min
  • 15 min
  • 1 hour

Add jitter to avoid retry storms.

Example rule:

  • retry up to 5 times
  • only retry on timeout / 429 / 5xx
  • do not retry on 4xx like 404 or 403 unless your business logic says otherwise

6. Persist crawl state externally

Don’t keep critical crawl state only in memory.

Persist:

  • visited URLs
  • discovered URLs
  • frontier / pending URL set
  • per-URL status
  • checkpoints for each batch

That way, if a worker crashes, another worker can resume.


7. Use checkpoints for very large crawls

For multi-hour or multi-million-page crawls, checkpoint progress regularly.

Example:

  • every 1,000 URLs processed
  • save frontier state
  • save last successful batch
  • resume from checkpoint after failure

8. Separate “job orchestration” from “fetching”

A common design:

  • orchestrator: creates batches, assigns work, handles retries
  • fetch workers: download pages
  • parser workers: extract links/content
  • storage workers: write results

This improves resilience and scaling.


Simple architecture example

  1. User submits crawl for example.com
  2. API creates crawl_job = 123
  3. Enqueue seed URL job
  4. Worker fetches page, extracts 200 links
  5. Worker writes results and enqueues 200 child URL jobs
  6. Each child job is retried independently if it fails
  7. Orchestrator marks job complete when frontier is empty

Practical retry policy

  • Retry only on transient errors
  • Use max retry count
  • Exponential backoff + jitter
  • Dead-letter queue after max retries
  • Manual requeue for dead-lettered jobs

Important gotchas

  • Duplicate processing: always assume at-least-once delivery
  • Queue explosion: batch or rate-limit URL discovery
  • Politeness: respect robots.txt, crawl-delay, domain rate limits
  • Memory usage: don’t store the whole frontier in RAM for large crawls
  • Timeouts: set worker timeouts lower than queue visibility timeouts if using SQS-like systems

If you want a concrete implementation

I can show you:

  1. a Redis/Celery design,
  2. an AWS SQS + worker design,
  3. or a SQL-backed job table pattern.

If you tell me your stack, I can sketch the exact queue/retry setup.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.