How do I set up a client approval workflow for deliverable review tracking and external client access?

A good client approval workflow usually has two parts:

1. Internal review and tracking for your team
2. External client access so clients can review, comment, and approve deliverables securely

Here’s a practical setup you can use.

---

1. Define the approval stages

Set clear statuses for each deliverable. A simple workflow might be:

• Draft
• Internal Review
• Client Review
• Revisions Needed
• Approved
• Archived

If you need more control, add:

• Waiting on Client
• Waiting on Internal
• Approved with Changes
• Rejected

This gives everyone one shared view of where the deliverable stands.

---

2. Track the right fields for each deliverable

For each item, track at least:

• Deliverable name
• Client name / account
• Owner
• Due date
• Current status
• Version number
• Review comments
• Approval date
• Approved by
• Link to file or preview
• Revision history

Optional but useful:

• Priority
• Internal reviewer
• Client reviewer
• SLA / response deadline
• Final sign-off required by

---

3. Build an internal review tracker

Use a shared system your team updates consistently. This can be:

• Project management software
• Spreadsheet
• Database table
• Notion/Airtable-style tracker
• CRM/project portal

Recommended internal view

Create a dashboard showing:

• Deliverables awaiting review
• Deliverables waiting on client
• Overdue approvals
• Approved deliverables
• Items needing revision

Internal process

1. Team uploads a draft
2. Internal reviewer checks it
3. Status changes to Client Review
4. Client gets notified
5. Feedback is logged
6. Revisions are made
7. Final approval is recorded

---

4. Set up external client access

You want clients to review without giving access to your full internal workspace.

Best practice: separate client portal or guest access

Use one of these models:

• Client portal with limited permissions
• Guest accounts restricted to specific projects/files
• Shared review links with comment-only access
• Approval-only interface if comments are handled elsewhere

Permissions to limit

Clients should usually be able to:

• View assigned deliverables
• Comment or annotate
• Approve or request changes

They should usually not be able to:

• See internal notes
• Edit statuses freely
• Access unrelated projects
• Download sensitive source files unless intended

---

5. Define the approval process clearly

A simple approval flow:

1. Internal team submits deliverable
2. System notifies client reviewer
3. Client reviews within a set time
4. Client chooses:
   • Approve
   • Request changes
   • Reject
5. If changes requested, item returns to internal team
6. Revised version is uploaded
7. Final approval is captured
8. Deliverable is marked complete

Important

Make sure each approval is tied to:

• A specific version
• A specific client reviewer
• A timestamp
• A comment history

That avoids confusion later.

---

6. Add version control

Version tracking is essential for deliverables.

Example:

• v1.0 = first internal draft
• v1.1 = revised after internal feedback
• v2.0 = client-facing revision
• v2.1 = final tweak

Always store:

• Version number
• What changed
• Who approved that version

This is especially important if clients review multiple iterations.

---

7. Use notifications and reminders

Automate reminders so things do not stall.

Examples:

• Notify client when item enters Client Review
• Reminder after 2 days with no response
• Escalation after 5 business days
• Notify account manager when approval is complete

Also notify internal staff when:

• Client requests changes
• Approval is rejected
• Due date is approaching

---

8. Create approval rules

You may want different approvals depending on deliverable type.

Examples:

• Marketing assets require both account manager and client sign-off
• Legal docs require compliance review
• Design items require only one client approver
• High-value deliverables require multi-level approval

Set rules like:

• Who can approve
• How many approvers are required
• Whether approval must be unanimous
• What happens if the approver is unavailable

---

9. Make comments structured

Unstructured feedback can become messy fast. Use a standard format such as:

• Location / section
• Issue type
• Suggested change
• Priority
• Resolved status

For example:

• Section: Homepage hero
• Comment: Replace headline with shorter version
• Priority: High
• Status: Open / Resolved

This makes review easier to manage.

---

10. Keep audit trails

For accountability, log:

• Who submitted the deliverable
• Who reviewed it
• Who approved it
• When each action happened
• What changed between versions

This is useful for:

• Client disputes
• Compliance
• Internal reporting
• Contract management

---

11. Recommended workflow structure

A clean version looks like this:

Internal

• Draft created
• Internal QA
• Internal approval
• Sent to client

External

• Client notified
• Client reviews
• Client comments / approves
• Revisions if needed
• Final approval

Closeout

• Final file stored
• Status updated to approved
• Deliverable archived
• Reporting updated

---

12. If you want a simple tool stack

You can implement this with:

• Tracker: Airtable, Notion, ClickUp, Asana, Monday, Jira, or a database
• File review: Google Drive, Dropbox, Frame.io, Filestage, or similar
• Client access: guest links, portal, or review tool
• Automation: Zapier, Make, native workflows, or API integration

---

13. Example fields for a deliverable tracker

Field	Purpose
Deliverable ID	Unique reference
Client	Account name
Project	Campaign/project name
Deliverable type	Design, copy, video, etc.
Owner	Internal owner
Reviewer	Internal reviewer
Client approver	External approver
Status	Current stage
Version	Current version
Due date	Deadline
Review deadline	Client feedback due date
Comments	Feedback log
Approval date	Final approval timestamp
Approval result	Approved / changes requested

---

14. Common mistakes to avoid

• Giving clients access to internal-only spaces
• Not tracking versions
• Allowing approval without recorded timestamps
• Mixing feedback from multiple versions
• Using vague statuses like “in progress”
• Not setting review deadlines
• No single source of truth for final approval

---

15. A good starting setup

If you want something simple and effective:

• Use a shared deliverable tracker
• Add statuses: Draft, Internal Review, Client Review, Revision, Approved
• Create guest client access to only relevant files
• Require comments and approvals on specific versions
• Automate notifications and reminders
• Keep an audit trail of every approval

---

If you want, I can also help you with one of these:

1. a sample approval workflow diagram
2. a spreadsheet/template for tracking deliverables
3. a database schema for client approvals
4. a recommended tool setup based on your team size