Prompt
How do I set up a scenario analysis platform for simulating price shocks across power, gas, and oil positions?
Latest observation
To set up a scenario analysis platform for simulating price shocks across power, gas, and oil positions, design it as a pipeline with four layers:
- Market data ingestion
- Scenario generation
- Portfolio valuation / risk engine
- Reporting and controls
Here’s a practical blueprint.
1) Define the business scope
Start by being explicit about:
- Products: spot, forwards, futures, swaps, options, storage, transport, swing, spark/dark spreads
- Asset classes: power, gas, oil, related FX and emissions if relevant
- Regions / hubs: e.g. UK power, EEX, PJM, Henry Hub, TTF, JKM, Brent, WTI, etc.
- Risk measures: PnL, delta, gamma, VaR, stress loss, CVaR, Greeks, liquidity-adjusted metrics
- Time granularity: intraday, daily, monthly, quarterly
- Horizon: overnight shock, 1 week, 1 month, multi-year
- Use case: trading, risk, hedging, stress testing, regulatory reporting
This determines how complex your models need to be.
2) Build the data foundation
Inputs you need
- Prices
- Power curves by region and tenor
- Gas hub curves
- Oil benchmarks and differentials
- Volatility surfaces
- For optionality and stress testing
- Correlations
- Cross-commodity correlations: power-gas, gas-oil, oil-FX, power-load, etc.
- Fundamentals
- Load, weather, outages, storage, LNG flows, refinery runs, pipeline constraints, hydro, renewables
- Position data
- Trades, volumes, delivery dates, optionality terms, mark-to-market info
- Curve metadata
- Commodity, hub, tenor, contract type, currency, units, seasonality rules
Data design
Create a canonical schema so all markets look similar:
instrument_idcommodityhub/regiondelivery_start,delivery_endprice,currency,unitcurve_type(spot, prompt month, seasonal strip, etc.)sourcetimestamp
Use a time-series store or warehouse, plus an in-memory layer for simulation runs.
3) Create a consistent risk factor model
Don’t simulate each instrument independently. Map everything to a smaller set of risk factors:
Example risk factors
- Power:
- Regional baseload / peakload curves
- Spark spread drivers
- Gas:
- Hub price curves
- Basis differentials
- Oil:
- Brent / WTI prompt and curve points
- Crack spread components if relevant
- Macro:
- FX, rates, carbon, weather indices
Factor representation
Represent each curve as:
- Level
- Slope
- Curvature
- Seasonal components
- Calendar spread relationships
This makes scenarios more realistic and easier to shock consistently.
4) Define scenario types
Your platform should support several scenario classes:
A. Deterministic shocks
Simple, transparent scenarios:
- Brent +10%, TTF -15%, power +20%
- Gas up more than power
- Regional outage causing power spike
- Winter demand shock
- LNG disruption scenario
B. Historical replay
Use past events:
- Russia/Ukraine gas shock
- Texas freeze
- COVID demand collapse
- OPEC supply shock
C. Statistical scenarios
Generate shocks from distributions:
- Monte Carlo on factors
- Correlated shocks
- Mean reversion and jumps
- Regime-switching volatility
D. Custom stress scenarios
User-defined combinations:
- Supply disruption + weather extreme + FX move
- Inventory draw + freight spike + refinery outage
E. Reverse stress testing
Find the shock that causes:
- breach of limits
- margin call
- liquidity shortfall
- specified loss threshold
5) Model cross-commodity relationships
Power, gas, and oil are linked, but not always linearly.
Useful relationships
- Power ↔ Gas
- Gas-fired generation sets marginal price in many markets
- Spark spread:
Power - Heat Rate × Gas
- Power ↔ Carbon
- Emissions costs affect generation economics
- Gas ↔ Oil
- Less direct, but linked through global macro, LNG, substitution, and fuel demand
- Crude ↔ Products
- Crack spreads for refined products
- Weather ↔ Power/Gas
- Load and heating demand
Practical approach
Use a hybrid model:
- Core factor correlations for baseline
- Rule-based conditional shocks for crisis regimes
- Spread relationships for economically linked products
Example:
- If gas rises 20%, power may rise 8–15% depending on fuel mix and market structure
- In constrained markets, power can spike more than gas
6) Choose valuation methodology
The scenario engine needs a pricing layer.
For linear products
- Revalue positions using shocked forward curves:
- futures, swaps, forwards, CFDs
- PnL = shocked MTM - base MTM
For optionality
Use:
- Black-76 / Black-Scholes-style models for simple options
- Tree / lattice models if needed
- Monte Carlo for path-dependent payoffs
- Fundamental dispatch models for power options or tolling
For physical assets
Include operational constraints:
- storage inventory limits
- injection/withdrawal rates
- pipeline capacity
- generation dispatch
- minimum up/down constraints
For many energy portfolios, a dispatch-aware valuation engine is critical.
7) Build the scenario engine
A good architecture:
Step 1: Load base curves
Pull the latest clean market data.
Step 2: Apply scenario shock rules
Each scenario produces transformations on risk factors:
- parallel shifts
- term-structure twists
- volatility shifts
- basis widenings
- correlation regime changes
Step 3: Map factor shocks to instrument prices
Convert factor changes back to instrument-level prices.
Step 4: Revalue portfolio
Run valuation/pricing models on all positions.
Step 5: Aggregate results
Produce:
- desk
- commodity
- region
- strategy
- legal entity
- trader
- maturity bucket
Step 6: Store and compare
Save scenario runs for:
- audit trail
- replay
- comparison over time
8) Add calibration and plausibility controls
Scenarios should be realistic and governed.
Controls
- Historical range checks
- Cross-factor consistency checks
- Limit on correlated moves
- Term-structure smoothness
- Seasonality preservation
- Sign constraints where economically necessary
- User approval for extreme scenarios
Example checks
- Power price cannot be negative in some markets unless your model allows it
- Gas basis should stay within plausible transport constraints
- Long-dated shocks should fade toward equilibrium unless a structural scenario is intended
9) Make it interactive for users
Users need to define and compare scenarios easily.
UI features
- Scenario builder with sliders and templates
- Base vs shocked curve charts
- PnL waterfall
- Risk factor heatmap
- Position sensitivity by tenor
- Comparison of multiple scenarios
- Scenario library and bookmarks
Helpful outputs
- Top contributors to loss/gain
- Worst instruments
- Margin impact
- Threshold breaches
- Hedged vs unhedged comparison
10) Use a scalable technical architecture
Typical stack
- Data lake / warehouse: Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks
- Time-series store: kdb+, TimescaleDB, InfluxDB
- Compute: Python, Spark, C++ for pricing hot paths
- Workflow orchestration: Airflow, Prefect, Dagster
- API layer: FastAPI, Java/Spring, .NET
- UI: React, Angular, or Tableau/Power BI for reporting
- Messaging: Kafka or RabbitMQ for feeds and async runs
Suggested system pattern
- Batch jobs for end-of-day risk
- Event-driven updates for intraday shocks
- Cached base valuations to speed up re-runs
- Parallelized revaluation by book, commodity, or maturity
11) Governance, audit, and model risk
Because this affects trading and risk decisions, add controls:
- Version every scenario definition
- Version pricing models and market data
- Keep audit logs of who ran what and when
- Validate models with backtesting and historical replay
- Separate scenario authoring from approval
- Keep explainability: why did PnL change?
This is especially important for regulatory and internal model governance.
12) A practical MVP roadmap
Phase 1: MVP
- Ingest base curves and positions
- Support deterministic shocks
- Revalue linear products
- Generate PnL reports
Phase 2: Better realism
- Correlated shocks
- Historical replay
- Volatility shocks
- Curve twist/steepening scenarios
- More commodities and regions
Phase 3: Advanced risk
- Optionality revaluation
- Physical dispatch
- Monte Carlo simulation
- Reverse stress testing
- Intraday streaming updates
13) Example scenario specification
A simple scenario definition might look like this:
{
"scenario_name": "Winter supply shock",
"date": "2026-01-15",
"shocks": [
{"risk_factor": "TTF_prompt", "type": "percent", "value": 25},
{"risk_factor": "UK_power_Q1", "type": "percent", "value": 18},
{"risk_factor": "Brent_prompt", "type": "percent", "value": 8},
{"risk_factor": "gas_power_correlation", "type": "override", "value": 0.85}
]
}
Your engine would:
- Load current curves
- Apply these shocks
- Reprice positions
- Report PnL and risk metrics
14) Key design recommendation
The biggest mistake is to build the platform around instruments instead of risk factors.
Model the underlying market drivers first, then map positions to them. That makes shocks more consistent across power, gas, and oil and avoids contradictory scenario outcomes.
If you want, I can also provide:
- a reference architecture diagram,
- a data model/schema, or
- a sample Python implementation of the scenario engine.
Observation history
Unlock observation history
Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.