Prompt

How do I set up QA automation for scoring support calls with a custom taxonomy and call recording support?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Customer Service1 observationLast seen Jul 19, 2026

Latest observation

Jul 19, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

To set up QA automation for scoring support calls with a custom taxonomy and call recording support, you generally need these pieces:

1) Define your QA taxonomy

Create the scorecard structure first. This usually includes:

  • Categories: e.g. Greeting, Verification, Problem Diagnosis, Resolution, Compliance
  • Questions / checks under each category
  • Scoring rules:
    • Pass/fail
    • Weighted points
    • Critical failures
    • N/A handling
  • Metadata:
    • Call type
    • Team/queue
    • Language
    • Customer segment

Example:

CategoryCheckTypeWeight
GreetingAgent greeted customer professionallyPass/Fail5
VerificationVerified customer identityCritical10
ResolutionProvided correct solutionPass/Fail20
ComplianceAvoided prohibited languageFail on violation15

2) Connect call recordings

Your automation needs access to audio files or call recordings from your telephony/contact-center system.

Typical setup:

  • Record calls in your provider (e.g. Twilio, Genesys, Five9, Aircall, NICE, etc.)
  • Store recordings in:
    • cloud storage (S3/GCS/Azure Blob), or
    • the vendor’s native storage with API access
  • Ensure you can retrieve:
    • recording URL
    • call ID
    • agent ID
    • timestamps
    • queue/team

3) Transcribe the calls

If you want automation, the recordings must be converted to text.

Options:

  • Native transcription from your contact-center vendor
  • Speech-to-text services like:
    • AWS Transcribe
    • Google Speech-to-Text
    • Azure Speech
    • OpenAI / other ASR tools

Best practice:

  • Use speaker diarization if possible, so agent and customer are separated
  • Preserve timestamps for each segment
  • Normalize transcript text for QA rules

4) Build the scoring logic

Your automation layer evaluates the transcript and recording against your taxonomy.

This can be done in a few ways:

  • Rules engine for deterministic checks
    Example: “Did agent say the verification phrase?”
  • LLM-based evaluation for nuanced checks
    Example: “Did the agent demonstrate empathy and de-escalation?”
  • Hybrid approach is usually best:
    • rules for compliance and explicit events
    • LLM for subjective assessments

Scoring pipeline:

  1. Ingest recording
  2. Transcribe
  3. Segment speaker turns
  4. Run taxonomy checks
  5. Generate per-question score
  6. Aggregate into final score
  7. Store results and evidence snippets

5) Add evidence and review workflow

For QA usefulness, each score should include evidence:

  • transcript snippet
  • timestamp
  • speaker
  • reason for pass/fail

This makes automated scoring auditable and easier for QA reviewers to trust.

Example output:

{
  "call_id": "12345",
  "taxonomy_version": "v3",
  "total_score": 87,
  "items": [
    {
      "category": "Verification",
      "question": "Verified customer identity",
      "score": 10,
      "evidence": "Agent asked for account number and ZIP code at 00:42"
    }
  ]
}

6) Configure call recording support end-to-end

If you’re building this into an existing workflow, make sure:

  • recording is enabled on the call routes/queues
  • recordings are linked to call metadata
  • access permissions are set correctly
  • retention/compliance policies are defined
  • consent requirements are met for the jurisdictions you operate in

7) Integrate into your QA tools

Push scoring results into:

  • QA dashboards
  • case management systems
  • CRM
  • BI tools
  • coaching workflows

Common integrations:

  • Webhooks
  • REST APIs
  • CSV/JSON exports
  • Direct database writes

8) Validate and calibrate

Automated QA should be tested against human-reviewed calls.

Steps:

  • score a sample set manually
  • compare automation to human QA
  • tune taxonomy rules/prompts/weights
  • measure precision, recall, and scoring consistency

Suggested architecture

Call system → Recording storage → Transcription service → QA scoring engine → QA dashboard/coaching

Minimal implementation approach

If you want to start quickly:

  1. Enable call recording
  2. Export recordings + metadata
  3. Transcribe calls
  4. Create a JSON taxonomy
  5. Use a rules/LLM scoring service
  6. Save results in your QA system

If you want, I can also help you with:

  • a sample taxonomy JSON
  • a reference architecture diagram
  • API design for call recording + scoring
  • or a step-by-step setup for a specific platform like Twilio, Genesys, or Five9

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.