Prompt
How do I set up QA automation for scoring support calls with a custom taxonomy and call recording support?
Latest observation
To set up QA automation for scoring support calls with a custom taxonomy and call recording support, you generally need these pieces:
1) Define your QA taxonomy
Create the scorecard structure first. This usually includes:
- Categories: e.g. Greeting, Verification, Problem Diagnosis, Resolution, Compliance
- Questions / checks under each category
- Scoring rules:
- Pass/fail
- Weighted points
- Critical failures
- N/A handling
- Metadata:
- Call type
- Team/queue
- Language
- Customer segment
Example:
| Category | Check | Type | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greeting | Agent greeted customer professionally | Pass/Fail | 5 |
| Verification | Verified customer identity | Critical | 10 |
| Resolution | Provided correct solution | Pass/Fail | 20 |
| Compliance | Avoided prohibited language | Fail on violation | 15 |
2) Connect call recordings
Your automation needs access to audio files or call recordings from your telephony/contact-center system.
Typical setup:
- Record calls in your provider (e.g. Twilio, Genesys, Five9, Aircall, NICE, etc.)
- Store recordings in:
- cloud storage (S3/GCS/Azure Blob), or
- the vendor’s native storage with API access
- Ensure you can retrieve:
- recording URL
- call ID
- agent ID
- timestamps
- queue/team
3) Transcribe the calls
If you want automation, the recordings must be converted to text.
Options:
- Native transcription from your contact-center vendor
- Speech-to-text services like:
- AWS Transcribe
- Google Speech-to-Text
- Azure Speech
- OpenAI / other ASR tools
Best practice:
- Use speaker diarization if possible, so agent and customer are separated
- Preserve timestamps for each segment
- Normalize transcript text for QA rules
4) Build the scoring logic
Your automation layer evaluates the transcript and recording against your taxonomy.
This can be done in a few ways:
- Rules engine for deterministic checks
Example: “Did agent say the verification phrase?” - LLM-based evaluation for nuanced checks
Example: “Did the agent demonstrate empathy and de-escalation?” - Hybrid approach is usually best:
- rules for compliance and explicit events
- LLM for subjective assessments
Scoring pipeline:
- Ingest recording
- Transcribe
- Segment speaker turns
- Run taxonomy checks
- Generate per-question score
- Aggregate into final score
- Store results and evidence snippets
5) Add evidence and review workflow
For QA usefulness, each score should include evidence:
- transcript snippet
- timestamp
- speaker
- reason for pass/fail
This makes automated scoring auditable and easier for QA reviewers to trust.
Example output:
{
"call_id": "12345",
"taxonomy_version": "v3",
"total_score": 87,
"items": [
{
"category": "Verification",
"question": "Verified customer identity",
"score": 10,
"evidence": "Agent asked for account number and ZIP code at 00:42"
}
]
}
6) Configure call recording support end-to-end
If you’re building this into an existing workflow, make sure:
- recording is enabled on the call routes/queues
- recordings are linked to call metadata
- access permissions are set correctly
- retention/compliance policies are defined
- consent requirements are met for the jurisdictions you operate in
7) Integrate into your QA tools
Push scoring results into:
- QA dashboards
- case management systems
- CRM
- BI tools
- coaching workflows
Common integrations:
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- CSV/JSON exports
- Direct database writes
8) Validate and calibrate
Automated QA should be tested against human-reviewed calls.
Steps:
- score a sample set manually
- compare automation to human QA
- tune taxonomy rules/prompts/weights
- measure precision, recall, and scoring consistency
Suggested architecture
Call system → Recording storage → Transcription service → QA scoring engine → QA dashboard/coaching
Minimal implementation approach
If you want to start quickly:
- Enable call recording
- Export recordings + metadata
- Transcribe calls
- Create a JSON taxonomy
- Use a rules/LLM scoring service
- Save results in your QA system
If you want, I can also help you with:
- a sample taxonomy JSON
- a reference architecture diagram
- API design for call recording + scoring
- or a step-by-step setup for a specific platform like Twilio, Genesys, or Five9
Observation history
Unlock observation history
Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.