Prompt
How do I use embeddings for classification with semantic labels?
Latest observation
Using embeddings for classification with semantic labels usually means:
- you represent both the input and the candidate labels as vectors,
- then classify by choosing the label whose vector is most similar to the input vector.
This is especially useful when labels have meaning beyond just IDs, like:
- “refund request”
- “technical issue”
- “billing question”
instead of arbitrary classes like 0, 1, 2.
Core idea
-
Embed the input text
- Example:
"My payment failed twice" - Convert it to an embedding vector.
- Example:
-
Embed each label name or label description
"billing issue""technical issue""account access problem"
-
Compare similarities
- Use cosine similarity or dot product.
- Pick the label with the highest similarity.
Basic workflow
1) Prepare semantic labels
Instead of just class IDs, use human-readable label strings.
Example:
Labels:
- "refund request"
- "login problem"
- "shipping delay"
You can also make them richer:
- "Customer wants money back because the product was unsatisfactory"
- "Customer cannot sign in or access the account"
- "Customer package has not arrived on time"
Richer descriptions often improve performance.
2) Create embeddings for labels
You can precompute label embeddings once.
label_texts = [
"refund request",
"login problem",
"shipping delay"
]
label_embeddings = embed(label_texts)
If using semantic descriptions, embed the descriptions instead.
3) Embed the input
query = "I can't log into my account"
query_embedding = embed([query])
4) Compute similarity
scores = cosine_similarity(query_embedding, label_embeddings)
predicted_label = label_texts[argmax(scores)]
Example with sentence embeddings
Here’s a simple Python-style example:
from sklearn.metrics.pairwise import cosine_similarity
import numpy as np
labels = [
"refund request",
"login problem",
"shipping delay"
]
label_desc = [
"Customer wants a refund for a purchase",
"Customer cannot log in to the account",
"Customer's order has not arrived yet"
]
# Precompute label embeddings
label_vecs = embed(label_desc)
# Classify a new message
text = "I'm unable to sign into my profile"
text_vec = embed([text])
scores = cosine_similarity(text_vec, label_vecs)[0]
pred_idx = np.argmax(scores)
print(labels[pred_idx])
Two common ways to do this
1) Nearest-label matching
This is the simplest.
- Embed input
- Embed label names/descriptions
- Pick the nearest label
Good for:
- zero-shot classification
- small or medium label sets
- quickly adding new labels without retraining
2) Train a classifier on embeddings
You can embed each text, then train a standard classifier on the vectors:
- logistic regression
- SVM
- random forest
- small neural network
Workflow:
- Encode each training example into an embedding.
- Train a classifier on those embeddings and labels.
- At inference time, embed new text and predict.
Good for:
- labeled training data
- higher accuracy than pure nearest-neighbor
- stable classification over fixed classes
Why semantic labels help
If your labels are semantically meaningful, the model can generalize better.
Example:
If the input is:
"My package still hasn't arrived"
it may match:
"shipping delay"even if that exact phrasing never appeared in training- because the meaning is close to the label description
This is useful for:
- few-shot classification
- zero-shot classification
- rapidly changing taxonomies
Tips for better results
Use label descriptions, not just short names
Instead of:
"billing"
Use:
"billing issue: customer has a payment, invoice, or charge problem"
This gives the embedding more signal.
Normalize label text
Make labels consistent in style and detail.
Bad:
"refund""customer wants money back because item was damaged""billing prob"
Better:
"refund request: customer asks for money back""billing issue: customer has a charge or invoice problem""shipping delay: order has not arrived on time"
Use calibrated thresholds for “none of the above”
If you have open-set inputs, don’t always force the best label.
Example:
- if top similarity < threshold, return
"unknown"or"other"
Try prompt formatting
For some embedding models, label text works better when formatted as a definition.
Example:
- Input:
"The customer cannot reset the password" - Label:
"Password reset issue: user cannot reset or change their password"
Consider multi-label classification
If a text can have multiple labels, use similarity scores for all labels and return those above a threshold.
Example:
"Refund request""Shipping delay"
for a message like:
"My order is late and I want my money back"
When to use this approach
Good choice if:
- you have semantic categories
- you want simple zero-shot or few-shot classification
- you need easy label expansion
- your data is noisy or limited
Less ideal if:
- you need very high accuracy on a fixed taxonomy
- labels are subtle and highly domain-specific
- embeddings alone miss important class boundaries
In those cases, train a supervised classifier on embeddings or fine-tune a model.
A practical recipe
If you want a strong baseline:
- Write a short natural-language description for each label.
- Embed all label descriptions.
- Embed each input.
- Use cosine similarity.
- Add a rejection threshold.
- If you have enough labeled data, train a classifier on embeddings.
Simple mental model
Think of classification as:
“Which label description is closest in meaning to this input?”
That’s the semantic-label version of embedding-based classification.
If you want, I can also show:
- a Python example using OpenAI embeddings
- a sentence-transformers example
- or a full end-to-end classification pipeline.