Prompt

How to migrate off of SES

Technology / Api platforms6 observationsLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Migrating off of Amazon SES usually means one of two things:

  1. Move to another email provider for sending transactional/marketing email, or
  2. Replace SES usage in your app with your own SMTP/server or different delivery architecture.

Here’s a practical migration plan.


1) Inventory your SES usage

Identify everything that depends on SES:

  • Sending
    • SMTP credentials
    • AWS SDK SendEmail / SendRawEmail
    • Templates
    • Bulk/transactional email
  • Receiving
    • Inbound SES rules / receipt processing
  • Events
    • Bounce, complaint, delivery notifications via SNS/EventBridge
  • Identity setup
    • Verified domains/emails
    • DKIM/SPF/DMARC
  • Configuration
    • Suppression lists
    • Sending limits / dedicated IPs
    • Region-specific setups

This helps determine the target provider and what needs to be rebuilt.


2) Choose the replacement

Common alternatives:

  • SendGrid — common for transactional + marketing
  • Mailgun — developer-friendly APIs, good for transactional
  • Postmark — strong transactional focus
  • Amazon Pinpoint — if you want to stay in AWS ecosystem
  • SMTP relay from another provider — simplest if your app already uses SMTP

Choose based on:

  • API vs SMTP support
  • Deliverability reputation
  • Webhooks for bounces/complaints
  • Template support
  • Pricing and sending volume
  • Compliance / data residency needs

3) Recreate the email surface area

If you use SES API

Map SES calls to the new provider’s API:

  • SendEmail → provider “send message” endpoint
  • SendRawEmail → provider raw MIME send
  • templates → provider templates or app-side templating

If you use SMTP

Replace SES SMTP host/port/credentials with the new provider’s SMTP settings.

If you receive email through SES

You’ll need a new inbound email solution:

  • Provider inbound parsing/webhooks, or
  • Separate mail server / mailbox ingestion flow

4) Set up domain authentication

This is critical for deliverability.

Update DNS for the new provider:

  • SPF
  • DKIM
  • DMARC
  • Optional: tracking CNAMEs, custom bounce/return-path records

Important:

  • Don’t leave SES and the new provider both claiming the same DKIM selectors.
  • If you’re sending from the same domain during cutover, coordinate SPF/DKIM carefully.

5) Handle bounces, complaints, and suppressions

SES often hides some of this behind its ecosystem, so recreate it:

  • Subscribe to provider webhooks or event callbacks
  • Update your app’s suppression list
  • Stop sending to bounced/unsubscribed users
  • Record complaint events for compliance

If you have a global suppression list from SES, export and import it if possible.


6) Migrate templates and message formatting

If SES templates are in use:

  • Export template content
  • Recreate them in the target provider
  • Or move template rendering into your app (recommended if you want portability)

Test:

  • Plain text
  • HTML
  • Attachments
  • Inline images
  • Character encoding
  • Reply-to/from names

7) Run in parallel before full cutover

Best practice:

  • Send a subset of traffic through the new provider first
  • Keep SES as fallback temporarily
  • Compare:
    • Delivery rates
    • Bounce rates
    • Complaint rates
    • Inbox placement
    • Latency

Start with:

  • Internal/staging mail
  • Low-risk transactional messages
  • A small % of production traffic

8) Update application code

Abstract the provider behind an interface, for example:

  • EmailSender.send(to, subject, body, ...)
  • EmailSender.sendRaw(mimeMessage)

Then swap implementations:

  • SES implementation
  • New provider implementation

This makes future migrations easier.


9) Cut over DNS and credentials

Once confident:

  • Update SMTP/API credentials in secrets manager
  • Update environment variables/config
  • Remove SES-specific IAM permissions
  • Remove SES config rules/webhooks
  • Update monitoring and alerting

10) Decommission SES safely

After a burn-in period:

  • Confirm no app paths still call SES
  • Remove verified identities if desired
  • Delete SMTP credentials
  • Remove configuration sets and event destinations
  • Clean up domain DNS records related to SES
  • Ensure no inbound rules still rely on SES

Common pitfalls

  • Poor deliverability after switching because new domain/IP reputation is cold
  • SPF breaks if too many include: mechanisms or multiple senders conflict
  • Missed bounce processing leads to poor reputation
  • Hardcoded SES assumptions in code or infrastructure
  • Templates differ between providers
  • Region mismatch if you used SES in a specific AWS region

If you want the easiest path

If your setup is mostly SMTP-based, migration can be as simple as:

  1. Choose provider
  2. Update SMTP host/port/user/pass
  3. Update DNS auth records
  4. Rebuild bounce/complaint handling via webhooks
  5. Test and cut over

If you want, I can give you:

  • a provider-by-provider migration checklist
  • a SES to SendGrid/Mailgun/Postmark mapping
  • or a code example for migrating from SES SDK/SMTP to another provider.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (6 observations for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.