Prompt
I hate how limited the Crunchbase API is
Latest observation
Yeah, Crunchbase’s API can feel pretty restrictive, especially if you’re trying to do anything beyond the basics.
Common pain points:
- Limited fields / nested data unless you’re on a higher tier
- Strict rate limits
- Paywalled access for data that looks like it should be straightforward
- Inconsistent coverage across companies, people, funding rounds, etc.
- Search constraints that make bulk enrichment or discovery annoying
If you’re running into a specific blocker, I can help you figure out:
- a workaround using their existing endpoints,
- a better data pipeline,
- or an alternative source for the type of data you need.
If you want, tell me what you’re trying to pull from Crunchbase and I’ll suggest the least painful route.
Brands
Observation history
How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?
Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.
Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?
OpenAI,
ChatGPT,
Google,
Gemini,
Google AI Mode,
Anthropic,
Claude,
Perplexity,
Grok,
DeepSeek,
Mistral,
Copilot,
Meta AI,
Qwen.
How can brands improve their AEO?
Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.
Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?
Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.
Want this interpreted for your brand?
Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.