Prompt

I'm building a bulk scraper for competitor sites with retries and deduping, what stack makes sense?

Technology / Cloud Infrastructure1 observationLast seen Oct 4, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 4, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A solid bulk-scraping stack depends on scale, target sites, and how much anti-bot friction you expect, but for retryable, deduped, large-volume scraping I’d usually recommend this shape:

Good default stack

1) Orchestration / jobs

  • Python for scraping logic
  • Celery + Redis or RQ for async job queues
  • If you need higher reliability / more workflow control: Temporal or Airflow

2) HTTP fetching

  • httpx or aiohttp for fast concurrent requests
  • Use asyncio for concurrency
  • Add a retry library like tenacity

3) Browser automation for JS-heavy sites

  • Playwright is usually the best default
  • Use it only when needed; keep most pages on plain HTTP to stay fast and cheaper

4) Deduping / idempotency

  • Postgres as the source of truth
  • Unique constraints on:
    • normalized URL
    • site + product ID
    • content hash
  • For high-scale approximate dedupe, add Redis Bloom filter or a Bloom filter in-memory layer

5) Storage

  • Postgres for metadata and state
  • S3/GCS for raw HTML, screenshots, and extracted artifacts
  • Optionally Elasticsearch/OpenSearch if you need search over captured pages

6) Parsing / extraction

  • BeautifulSoup + lxml for static HTML
  • selectolax if you want faster parsing
  • XPath/CSS selectors with site-specific extractors

7) Observability

  • Prometheus + Grafana for metrics
  • Sentry for exception tracking
  • Structured logs with JSON logging

Recommended architecture

Ingestion flow

  1. URL discovered or imported
  2. Normalize and dedupe
  3. Queue fetch job
  4. Fetch with retries/backoff
  5. If blocked or JS required, route to Playwright
  6. Parse content
  7. Persist raw + extracted data
  8. Mark status and store hash for dedupe

Retry strategy

  • Retry on:
    • 429
    • 5xx
    • connection timeouts
    • transient DNS/socket failures
  • Exponential backoff with jitter
  • Cap retries per URL to avoid infinite loops
  • Keep a dead-letter queue for failed jobs

Dedupe strategy

Use multiple layers:

  • URL normalization: remove tracking params, canonicalize scheme/host/path
  • Content hashing: hash meaningful body content after boilerplate removal
  • Entity dedupe: product/company IDs if available
  • Seen-URL store: Postgres unique index or Redis set for fast checks

If you expect anti-bot measures

Then add:

  • Proxy rotation through a reputable provider
  • Per-domain rate limiting
  • Cookie/session management
  • User-agent rotation, but don’t rely on that alone
  • Separate queues per domain to avoid hammering a single site

Best “practical” stack by scale

Small/medium scale

  • Python
  • httpx + asyncio
  • tenacity
  • BeautifulSoup/lxml
  • Postgres
  • Redis
  • Celery
  • Playwright for fallback

Larger scale

  • Python workers
  • Kafka or RabbitMQ instead of plain Redis queues
  • Temporal for orchestration
  • Postgres + S3
  • Playwright isolated in a separate worker pool
  • Redis Bloom / approximate dedupe
  • OpenSearch for retrieval

My opinionated recommendation

If you want something that’s fast to build and production-friendly, start with:

  • Python
  • httpx + asyncio
  • Playwright
  • Postgres
  • Redis
  • Celery
  • tenacity
  • S3
  • Prometheus/Grafana

That gives you a very good balance of speed, maintainability, and scale.


One important note

Make sure you’re scraping in a way that respects the target sites’ terms, robots rules where applicable, and rate limits. For competitor monitoring, it’s also worth checking legal/compliance boundaries in your jurisdiction.

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a reference architecture diagram,
  2. a minimal production-ready folder structure, or
  3. a sample Python crawler with retries + dedupe.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.