Prompt

I'm building a document parser and want OCR with tables and coordinates

Artificial Intelligence / Computer Vision1 observationLast seen Oct 11, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 11, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

For OCR with tables and coordinates, you’ll want a system that returns:

  • Recognized text
  • Bounding boxes / coordinates for each word, line, or block
  • Table structure detection
  • Ideally page-level layout information too

Good options

1) Cloud OCR APIs

Best if you want strong accuracy and less engineering.

  • AWS Textract

    • OCR + tables + forms
    • Returns coordinates for words/lines/tables/cells
    • Good for invoices, forms, scanned docs
  • Google Document AI

    • Strong layout and table extraction
    • Returns bounding boxes, tables, paragraphs, tokens
    • Good for general document parsing
  • Azure Document Intelligence (Form Recognizer)

    • OCR + tables + key-value pairs
    • Gives polygons/coordinates for elements
    • Good enterprise option

2) Open-source stack

Best if you need self-hosting or customization.

  • PaddleOCR

    • Strong OCR
    • Can return text boxes and confidence
    • Often paired with layout/table models
  • Tesseract

    • Basic OCR with box coordinates
    • Weaker on complex layouts and tables
  • LayoutParser + Detectron2 models

    • Useful for layout detection
    • Can identify tables, headers, paragraphs, etc.
  • Table Transformer / PubTables-1M models

    • Good for table structure extraction
    • Often used with OCR output

Recommended approach

If your priority is tables + coordinates + production readiness, I’d suggest:

  • AWS Textract if your docs are mostly forms/invoices and you want simplicity
  • Google Document AI if you need rich layout/table structure
  • Azure Document Intelligence if you’re already in Microsoft ecosystem

If you want open-source:

  • Use PaddleOCR for OCR
  • Use a table detection/structure model for table layout
  • Merge OCR boxes with detected table cells

Data you should expect

A good OCR parser should output something like:

{
  "page": 1,
  "text": "Item Qty Price",
  "blocks": [
    {
      "type": "table",
      "bbox": [100, 200, 500, 600],
      "cells": [
        {"row": 1, "col": 1, "text": "Item", "bbox": [110, 210, 180, 240]},
        {"row": 1, "col": 2, "text": "Qty", "bbox": [190, 210, 250, 240]}
      ]
    }
  ]
}

If you want to build it yourself

A practical pipeline is:

  1. Preprocess image/PDF

    • deskew
    • denoise
    • enhance contrast
  2. Detect layout

    • text blocks
    • tables
    • figures
  3. Run OCR

    • get words + boxes
  4. Table reconstruction

    • assign OCR tokens to table cells
    • infer rows/columns from grid lines or spatial alignment
  5. Export structured JSON

    • page, block, line, word, bbox, table cells

Quick recommendation

  • Need fastest path: Textract / Document AI
  • Need self-hosted: PaddleOCR + table detection model
  • Need just OCR boxes: Tesseract or PaddleOCR
  • Need strong table extraction: Document AI or Textract

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a Python example
  2. a comparison table of OCR tools
  3. a full JSON schema for OCR + tables + coordinates

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.