Prompt

I’m building a SaaS app and need users to sign in with Google and Microsoft — what auth approach should I use?

Technology / Identity & Access1 observationLast seen Oct 6, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 6, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

For a SaaS app where users need to sign in with Google and Microsoft, the usual best choice is:

Use OpenID Connect (OIDC) / OAuth 2.0 with a dedicated auth layer

In practice, that means one of these approaches:

Best overall for most SaaS apps

Use a managed auth provider that supports Google + Microsoft social/enterprise login, such as:

  • Auth0
  • Clerk
  • WorkOS
  • Firebase Auth
  • Supabase Auth
  • AWS Cognito

This gives you:

  • One consistent login flow
  • Less security/PKCE/session/token handling to implement yourself
  • Easier account linking across providers
  • Better support for MFA, passwordless, user management, and enterprise features later

Recommended auth pattern

1) Use OIDC for login, not plain OAuth

  • OAuth 2.0 is for authorization
  • OpenID Connect adds identity/login on top of OAuth
  • Google and Microsoft both support OIDC

2) Use the Authorization Code Flow with PKCE

This is the current recommended flow for:

  • Web apps
  • SPAs
  • Mobile apps
  • Backend-for-frontend architectures

Avoid older flows like the implicit flow.

3) Let your backend create your own app session

After Google/Microsoft authenticate the user:

  • Verify the ID token / auth code server-side
  • Map them to your internal user record
  • Create your own session cookie or JWT for your app

This keeps your app independent from Google/Microsoft token lifetimes.


If you want the simplest architecture

Option A: Managed auth provider

Best if you want to move fast and avoid auth complexity.

Typical flow:

  1. User clicks “Sign in with Google” or “Microsoft”
  2. Redirect to provider
  3. Provider returns user identity to your auth service
  4. Your app creates a session

Good when:

  • You want to ship quickly
  • You may need SSO/SAML later
  • You want account linking and profile sync handled for you

If you want to build it yourself

Option B: Direct integration with Google + Microsoft using OIDC

Do this only if you’re comfortable owning:

  • PKCE
  • Token validation
  • Refresh token handling
  • Account linking
  • Session security
  • Redirect URI management
  • CSRF/state handling

This can work well, but it’s more maintenance.


SaaS-specific recommendation

If you’re building a B2B SaaS, consider:

  • Google login
  • Microsoft login
  • Potentially SAML SSO later for enterprise customers

In that case, a provider like WorkOS or Auth0 is often a strong fit because they handle both:

  • Social login
  • Enterprise SSO

Security checklist

No matter which route you choose:

  • Use Authorization Code + PKCE
  • Validate issuer, audience, signature, nonce, and expiration
  • Use HTTPS only
  • Store sessions in HttpOnly, Secure cookies if web-based
  • Support account linking carefully to avoid duplicate users
  • Don’t trust email alone as a unique identity without verification rules

My practical recommendation

For most SaaS startups:

  • Use Auth0 / Clerk / WorkOS / Supabase Auth
  • Enable Google + Microsoft
  • Use OIDC Authorization Code Flow with PKCE
  • Create your own app session after login

If you’re enterprise-focused:

  • Pick WorkOS or Auth0
  • Plan for SAML + SCIM in addition to Google/Microsoft

If you want, I can also recommend the best option based on your stack:

  • Next.js / React
  • Django / FastAPI
  • Rails
  • Node / Express
  • Go
  • Mobile app

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as Circuit. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.