Prompt

I’m building a semantic search feature over internal docs; what’s the simplest architecture?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Search1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

The simplest solid architecture for semantic search over internal docs is:

1) Ingest docs

Pull from your sources:

  • Google Drive / SharePoint / Confluence / Notion / file shares
  • PDFs, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, plain text

2) Extract text

Convert each document into clean text:

  • OCR if needed for scans
  • Keep metadata like:
    • title
    • source URL/path
    • author
    • date
    • doc type
    • permissions/access group

3) Chunk the text

Split docs into small overlapping chunks:

  • Typical size: 200–500 tokens
  • Overlap: 20–100 tokens
  • Store chunk boundaries so you can cite the source later

4) Create embeddings

Run each chunk through an embedding model and store the vector.

Good default:

  • Use a general-purpose embedding model
  • Normalize embeddings if your vector DB expects it

5) Store in a vector index

Use a vector database or vector-capable search store:

  • Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, Qdrant, pgvector, Elasticsearch/OpenSearch kNN
  • Store:
    • embedding
    • chunk text
    • doc metadata
    • ACL/permissions info

6) Query flow

When a user searches:

  1. Embed the query
  2. Vector search top-k similar chunks
  3. Filter by permissions
  4. Optionally rerank results with a cross-encoder or LLM reranker
  5. Return:
    • top snippets
    • source document links
    • highlighted passages

7) Add a hybrid search layer

For better quality, combine:

  • semantic search
  • keyword/BM25 search

This helps with:

  • exact names
  • acronyms
  • IDs
  • rare terms

A common simple approach:

  • retrieve from both vector and keyword indexes
  • merge results
  • rerank

8) Keep permissions enforced

Important for internal docs:

  • filter at retrieval time by user/group ACL
  • do not rely on the LLM to hide unauthorized content

Minimal stack

If you want the easiest production-friendly setup:

  • Ingestion/extraction: Python + Apache Tika / unstructured
  • Embeddings: OpenAI or open-source embedding model
  • Storage: Postgres + pgvector or Qdrant
  • Search: hybrid vector + BM25
  • Reranking: optional, but useful
  • UI/API: simple backend endpoint returning passages + links

Simplest viable architecture

If you want the fewest moving parts:

Docs → text extraction → chunking → embeddings → pgvector/Qdrant → query embedding → top-k retrieval → return snippets

That’s enough to ship an MVP.

Common pitfalls

  • Chunks too large or too small
  • Ignoring ACLs
  • Not storing source metadata
  • Using only vector search and missing exact-term matches
  • No reranking, leading to noisy top results
  • Not updating embeddings when docs change

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a reference architecture diagram,
  2. a Python implementation outline, or
  3. a minimal stack recommendation based on your cloud/provider.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.