Prompt

I'm building an agent workflow and want to debug each step end to end

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Oct 9, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 9, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A good way to debug an agent workflow end to end is to make each step observable, replayable, and attributable.

Recommended debugging setup

1) Break the workflow into explicit stages

Example:

  • input received
  • plan generated
  • tool selected
  • tool executed
  • result parsed
  • final response produced

For each stage, log:

  • stage name
  • timestamp
  • input payload
  • output payload
  • tool name / model name
  • latency
  • errors / retries

2) Add a trace ID to every request

Use one trace_id across the entire workflow so you can follow a single run through all steps.

Example log fields:

{
  "trace_id": "run_123",
  "step": "tool_execution",
  "input": {...},
  "output": {...},
  "duration_ms": 184
}

3) Store intermediate artifacts

Save:

  • raw model prompts and completions
  • tool call arguments
  • tool responses
  • parsed/normalized results
  • final answer

This lets you replay the same execution later.

4) Build a step-by-step replay mode

A replay mode should let you:

  • rerun from any step
  • inject mocked tool outputs
  • compare actual vs expected outputs
  • pause before/after each tool call

5) Use structured logging, not plain text

Prefer JSON logs or event records so you can filter by:

  • trace_id
  • step
  • error type
  • tool name

6) Add assertions at every boundary

Check assumptions between steps:

  • input schema valid
  • tool args serializable
  • tool output contains expected keys
  • parsed response matches contract

7) Capture failures with context

On errors, record:

  • failing step
  • exception stack
  • last valid state
  • upstream inputs
  • retry count

8) Create a trace viewer

Even a simple UI or notebook that shows:

  • step sequence
  • inputs/outputs
  • timings
  • errors
  • retries

helps a lot during debugging.


Minimal implementation pattern

A simple pattern is wrapping every step with a tracing decorator:

def traced_step(step_name):
    def decorator(fn):
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            start = time.time()
            try:
                result = fn(*args, **kwargs)
                log_event({
                    "step": step_name,
                    "status": "success",
                    "input": {"args": args, "kwargs": kwargs},
                    "output": result,
                    "duration_ms": int((time.time() - start) * 1000),
                })
                return result
            except Exception as e:
                log_event({
                    "step": step_name,
                    "status": "error",
                    "input": {"args": args, "kwargs": kwargs},
                    "error": str(e),
                    "duration_ms": int((time.time() - start) * 1000),
                })
                raise
        return wrapper
    return decorator

If you’re using tools / LLM calls

Also log:

  • system prompt
  • user prompt
  • retrieved context
  • tool schema
  • model parameters
  • raw model output
  • tool call payloads

This is usually where hidden bugs live.


Best practices

  • Keep a debug mode separate from production mode
  • Redact secrets before logging
  • Use deterministic seeds where possible
  • Mock external APIs in tests
  • Create golden test cases for common paths and failure paths

If you want, I can help you design:

  1. a trace schema,
  2. a Python wrapper/decorator for step-by-step tracing, or
  3. a LangChain / OpenAI Agents debugging setup.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.