Prompt

I'm building an internal research tool and need a search API for datasets

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 8, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 8, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Absolutely — I can help design a search API for datasets.

To make it useful for your internal research tool, the API should usually support:

  • Keyword search over title, description, tags, and schema
  • Structured filtering by domain, owner, source, date, format, access level, etc.
  • Sorting by relevance, freshness, popularity, or quality score
  • Facets/aggregations for fast UI filters
  • Pagination
  • Permission-aware results so users only see datasets they can access

A practical API shape

GET /datasets/search

Example query:

GET /datasets/search?q=customer churn&domain=finance&format=parquet&sort=relevance&page=1&page_size=20

Example response

{
  "results": [
    {
      "id": "ds_123",
      "name": "Customer Churn 2024",
      "description": "Monthly customer retention and churn dataset",
      "tags": ["retention", "finance", "customers"],
      "owner": "data-platform",
      "format": "parquet",
      "updated_at": "2026-10-01T12:00:00Z",
      "relevance_score": 0.94,
      "access_level": "internal"
    }
  ],
  "page": 1,
  "page_size": 20,
  "total": 132,
  "facets": {
    "format": [
      {"value": "parquet", "count": 80},
      {"value": "csv", "count": 32}
    ],
    "domain": [
      {"value": "finance", "count": 44},
      {"value": "marketing", "count": 21}
    ]
  }
}

Recommended search fields

A good dataset search index often includes:

  • id
  • name
  • description
  • tags
  • owners
  • source_system
  • schema_fields
  • data_products
  • created_at, updated_at
  • format
  • domain
  • access_level
  • quality_score
  • freshness_score

Useful filters

Common filters you may want:

  • domain
  • format
  • owner
  • tags
  • source_system
  • updated_after
  • updated_before
  • row_count_min / row_count_max
  • access_level
  • quality_score_min

Minimal OpenAPI sketch

paths:
  /datasets/search:
    get:
      summary: Search datasets
      parameters:
        - name: q
          in: query
          schema: { type: string }
        - name: domain
          in: query
          schema: { type: string }
        - name: format
          in: query
          schema: { type: string }
        - name: sort
          in: query
          schema: { type: string, enum: [relevance, updated_at, quality_score] }
        - name: page
          in: query
          schema: { type: integer, default: 1 }
        - name: page_size
          in: query
          schema: { type: integer, default: 20, maximum: 100 }
      responses:
        "200":
          description: Search results

Implementation options

For the backend search engine, typical choices are:

  • Elasticsearch / OpenSearch — best for full-text + faceted search
  • PostgreSQL full-text search — good for simpler internal tools
  • Vector search + keyword search hybrid — useful if you want semantic search on dataset descriptions or column names

Good next step

If you want, I can generate one of these for you:

  1. A complete OpenAPI spec
  2. A FastAPI/Node.js implementation
  3. A search index schema for Elasticsearch/OpenSearch
  4. A design for hybrid keyword + semantic dataset search

If you tell me your stack (Python/Node/Java/etc.) and what metadata you have for datasets, I’ll tailor it.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.