Prompt

I'm building an LLM agent with tools; what should I use for tracing and debugging?

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Oct 9, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 9, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

For tracing and debugging an LLM agent with tools, you generally want three layers of observability:

  1. Request/response tracing
  2. Tool-call and workflow tracing
  3. Evaluation/debugging dashboards

Here are the best options, depending on how much you want to build yourself.

Best overall choices

1) OpenTelemetry + a backend

Best if you want vendor-neutral, production-grade observability.

Use:

  • OpenTelemetry for traces, logs, and metrics
  • A backend like:
    • Jaeger
    • Grafana Tempo
    • Honeycomb
    • Datadog
    • New Relic

Good for:

  • End-to-end traces across your app, agent steps, and tool calls
  • Correlating latency, errors, retries, and timeouts
  • Production debugging

Why it’s good:

  • Standardized
  • Not tied to one LLM framework
  • Works well if your agent calls APIs, databases, and services

2) LangSmith

Best if you’re using LangChain/LangGraph or want LLM-specific tracing quickly.

Good for:

  • Tracing prompts, model calls, tool calls, and agent state
  • Inspecting runs step-by-step
  • Comparing experiments
  • Evaluations and datasets

Why it’s good:

  • Very easy to start with
  • Purpose-built for LLM apps
  • Great for debugging agent behavior

3) Arize Phoenix

Best for LLM observability, evals, and analysis with a strong open-source option.

Good for:

  • Tracing LLM calls
  • Viewing spans and spans relationships
  • Evaluations, retrieval debugging, and analysis
  • Open-source self-hosting

Why it’s good:

  • Strong for RAG and agent workflows
  • Good balance of tracing + analysis
  • Flexible if you want more control

If you want the simplest answer

  • Using LangChain/LangGraph? Start with LangSmith
  • Want open standards and production observability? Use OpenTelemetry
  • Want an open-source LLM observability tool? Use Phoenix

What to trace in your agent

At minimum, capture:

  • User input
  • System prompt / agent prompt
  • Model name and parameters
  • Each model call
  • Each tool call
  • Tool inputs/outputs
  • Retries/errors
  • Token usage and latency
  • Final response
  • Intermediate reasoning/state if your framework exposes it

If your agent does retrieval:

  • Query
  • Retrieved documents/chunks
  • Scores/rank
  • Selected context

Practical recommendation

If you’re starting from scratch:

  • Instrument with OpenTelemetry
  • Add an LLM-specific UI like LangSmith or Phoenix
  • Export traces to your existing observability stack

If you want the fastest path to useful debugging:

  • LangSmith is usually the easiest win for agent/tool tracing

Nice extras

Also consider:

  • Prompt/version tracking: prompt templates, model versions, tool schema versions
  • Eval framework: e.g. Ragas, DeepEval, promptfoo
  • Structured logs: JSON logs with trace IDs
  • Replay support: ability to rerun a trace with the same inputs

My short recommendation

If you just want a solid stack:

  • Tracing: OpenTelemetry
  • LLM debugging UI: LangSmith or Phoenix
  • Evaluations: promptfoo or DeepEval

If you tell me your stack (LangChain, OpenAI Agents SDK, custom Python, TypeScript, etc.), I can suggest the best exact setup and a minimal instrumentation example.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.