Prompt
I'm building real-time inference endpoints and need low-latency GPU serving
Latest observation
Oct 9, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
For real-time inference endpoints with low latency on GPU, the main goal is to keep the model “hot,” minimize framework overhead, and maximize batching/throughput without hurting tail latency.
What to optimize
- Cold start time: keep instances warm, avoid frequent autoscaling to zero.
- Model loading time: preload weights, use optimized formats.
- GPU utilization: avoid underutilized GPUs, but don’t overbatch if p95 latency matters.
- Network overhead: keep clients and serving close; prefer region-local traffic.
- Framework overhead: choose a lightweight serving stack.
- Memory fragmentation / KV cache: especially important for LLMs.
Good serving stacks for low-latency GPU inference
- TensorRT / TensorRT-LLM: best for maximum performance if your model is supported and you can invest in optimization.
- NVIDIA Triton Inference Server: strong general-purpose production server, supports dynamic batching, concurrent model execution, and multiple backends.
- vLLM: excellent for LLM serving with paged attention and high throughput/latency balance.
- Hugging Face TGI: simpler LLM serving, good production ergonomics.
- TorchServe / custom FastAPI + PyTorch: easiest to start, but usually not the best latency at scale.
Practical latency tips
- Use FP16/BF16 or INT8/FP8 where acceptable.
- Enable CUDA graphs if your input shapes are stable.
- Use dynamic batching only if it improves throughput without violating p95/p99 targets.
- Pin one model per GPU when latency is critical.
- Warm up the model with representative requests.
- Keep request preprocessing lightweight and on CPU if it doesn’t bottleneck.
- Use gRPC for lower overhead than REST in many cases.
- Co-locate serving and feature retrieval if you have online features.
If you’re serving LLMs specifically
- Prefer vLLM or TensorRT-LLM.
- Use:
- continuous batching
- KV cache optimization
- streaming responses
- token-level latency monitoring
- Watch out for:
- long prompts
- context-length spikes
- queue buildup
- GPU memory fragmentation
Deployment patterns
- Single-model dedicated endpoint for strict latency SLAs.
- Multi-model shared GPU only if you can tolerate some jitter.
- Autoscale based on queue depth, GPU utilization, and p95 latency, not CPU alone.
- Use rolling deploys and shadow traffic to avoid downtime.
Observability metrics
Track:
- p50 / p95 / p99 latency
- queue time vs compute time
- GPU utilization
- GPU memory usage
- token throughput
- error rate / timeouts
- cold starts
If you tell me:
- the model type (vision, tabular, LLM, embedding, etc.),
- your latency target,
- expected QPS, and
- your GPU type,
I can recommend a concrete serving architecture and stack.