Prompt

I'm building software that has to integrate with Outlook and Google calendars, what API should I use?

Technology / Scheduling & Booking Software1 observationLast seen Oct 15, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 15, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you need to integrate with both Outlook and Google Calendar, the usual choice is:

Use the provider APIs directly

  • Google Calendar API for Google accounts
  • Microsoft Graph API for Outlook / Microsoft 365 / Exchange Online calendars

That’s generally the best approach because each provider has its own auth, permissions, event model, and sync behavior.

Recommended setup

Build a small abstraction layer in your app, for example:

  • listCalendars()
  • listEvents()
  • createEvent()
  • updateEvent()
  • deleteEvent()
  • watchChanges() / webhook handling

Then implement:

  • one adapter for Google Calendar API
  • one adapter for Microsoft Graph Calendar API

Why not use a single universal API?

There are calendar aggregation APIs like:

  • Nylas
  • Cronofy
  • Fantastical-like sync platforms (less for app integration)
  • others in the calendar infrastructure space

These can save time if you want:

  • one unified API
  • fewer OAuth integrations
  • normalized event objects
  • built-in sync/webhook handling

But they add:

  • vendor dependency
  • extra cost
  • possible limitations vs direct provider APIs

My recommendation

  • If you’re building something serious and want maximum control:
    Use Google Calendar API + Microsoft Graph API directly.
  • If you want fastest time-to-market with less integration work:
    Use a calendar aggregation service like Nylas or Cronofy.

Practical note

For Outlook, don’t use the older Outlook REST API — it’s deprecated.
Use Microsoft Graph instead.

If you want, I can also give you:

  1. a feature-by-feature comparison of Google vs Microsoft Graph, or
  2. a suggested architecture for supporting both calendars cleanly.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.