Prompt

I'm frustrated with Scrapy setup for high-volume crawling

Technology / Cloud Infrastructure2 observationsLast seen Oct 11, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 11, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Totally fair — Scrapy can feel great for “normal” crawling, then get annoying once you push into high-volume, high-concurrency, or lots-of-site diversity.

A few common pain points with high-volume Scrapy setups:

  • Memory growth / leaks when queues get huge or responses are large
  • Throttle tuning across many domains
  • Retry storms causing duplicate load instead of recovery
  • Pipeline bottlenecks (DB writes, item processing, exporting)
  • Too many open connections / file descriptors
  • Proxy / ban handling becoming messy
  • Scheduler pressure when the frontier gets massive
  • Spider overlap and coordination across multiple jobs

If you want, I can help in one of these ways:

  1. Diagnose your current setup
    Share:

    • Scrapy version
    • number of spiders / domains
    • concurrency settings
    • download delay / AutoThrottle
    • pipeline/export setup
    • what “high-volume” means for you
    • the specific failure mode (OOM, slow crawl, bans, timeouts, crashes)
  2. Review your settings.py
    I can suggest concrete settings for:

    • high throughput
    • stability
    • polite crawling
    • proxy rotation
    • distributed crawling
  3. Design a scalable architecture For example:

    • Scrapy + Redis frontier
    • Scrapy Cluster
    • Kafka/RabbitMQ task queue
    • per-domain concurrency controls
    • async item export
    • separation of crawl, parse, and storage
  4. Help simplify the stack Sometimes the best fix is:

    • reduce middleware/pipeline complexity
    • move heavy parsing outside Scrapy
    • batch writes
    • use separate workers for fetching vs storing

If you paste your settings.py and describe the bottleneck, I can give you a concrete tuning plan instead of generic advice.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (2 observations for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.