Prompt

I'm trying to automate research with an API; suggest options for public records and company data that are easy to integrate

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 8, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 8, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Here are some easy-to-integrate public records and company data options for automating research with an API, grouped by use case.

1) Company / business intelligence APIs

OpenCorporates

  • What it gives: Global company registry data, officers, filings, ownership links
  • Why it’s easy: Clean API, strong entity matching, good for basic corporate lookup workflows
  • Best for: Company verification, corporate structure, cross-referencing names
  • Notes: Coverage varies by country and registry source

Companies House API (UK)

  • What it gives: UK company registration, officers, filing history, PSC data
  • Why it’s easy: Official government API, straightforward REST endpoints
  • Best for: UK-based entity research and compliance checks
  • Notes: Very developer-friendly, but limited to UK

SEC EDGAR API / EDGAR data

  • What it gives: Public US filings, 10-Ks, 10-Qs, 8-Ks, ownership filings
  • Why it’s easy: Public data, widely documented access patterns
  • Best for: Public company research, financial analysis, compliance monitoring
  • Notes: Not a “single polished API” from SEC, but widely used with wrappers and data feeds

Crunchbase API

  • What it gives: Startup/company profiles, funding rounds, acquisitions, people
  • Why it’s easy: Structured data and simple integration
  • Best for: Startup research, business development, market mapping
  • Notes: Paid tiers usually required

Clearbit API

  • What it gives: Company enrichment, domain-to-company mapping, firmographics
  • Why it’s easy: Very simple enrichment use cases
  • Best for: Lead enrichment, account research
  • Notes: Product availability has changed over time; check current offering and docs

People Data Labs (PDL)

  • What it gives: Company and person enrichment, employment history, firmographics
  • Why it’s easy: Designed for API-first enrichment pipelines
  • Best for: Sales ops, research workflows, identity resolution
  • Notes: Commercial service; strong developer experience

ZoomInfo

  • What it gives: B2B company and contact data
  • Why it’s easy: Integrations available, but often more enterprise-oriented
  • Best for: GTM/sales research
  • Notes: Typically heavier sales process, not always “easy” in a lightweight sense

2) Public records / legal / regulatory APIs

CourtListener / RECAP

  • What it gives: US court opinions, dockets, some PACER-copied records
  • Why it’s easy: Public API, great for legal research automation
  • Best for: Litigation monitoring, case research
  • Notes: Coverage depends on source availability

Federal Register API

  • What it gives: US federal rules, proposed rules, notices
  • Why it’s easy: Official API, clean search/filtering
  • Best for: Regulatory monitoring
  • Notes: Excellent for policy and compliance workflows

GovInfo API

  • What it gives: US congressional, legal, and government publications
  • Why it’s easy: Official government API
  • Best for: Legislative and regulatory research
  • Notes: Broader document access than a typical “records” API

FOIA / open-data portals

  • What it gives: Depends on jurisdiction and agency
  • Why it’s easy: Many portals support simple REST/CSV access
  • Best for: Administrative records, procurement, licensing, permits
  • Notes: Quality varies widely; often requires custom normalization

3) Property, liens, and asset-related data

County/municipal open data portals

  • What it gives: Property tax, permits, zoning, building records, business licenses
  • Why it’s easy: Many expose CSV/JSON endpoints or Socrata APIs
  • Best for: Local investigations, real estate research
  • Notes: Highly fragmented across jurisdictions

Socrata-powered portals

  • What it gives: Whatever the city/state publishes
  • Why it’s easy: Standard API pattern across many governments
  • Best for: Public records aggregation at local/state level
  • Notes: Extremely useful if you need many jurisdictions

Property data vendors

  • Examples: ATTOM, Regrid, CoreLogic (enterprise)
  • Why it’s easy: Structured APIs for parcels, ownership, valuation
  • Best for: Real estate analytics
  • Notes: Usually commercial and sometimes expensive

4) Sanctions, watchlists, and compliance data

OFAC / sanctions lists

  • What it gives: Sanctions lists, entities, programs
  • Why it’s easy: Official government data files and feeds
  • Best for: Compliance screening
  • Notes: Often implemented as downloadable datasets rather than a pure API

OpenSanctions

  • What it gives: Consolidated sanctions, watchlists, PEPs, adverse media sources
  • Why it’s easy: Good API and entity resolution features
  • Best for: AML/KYC workflows
  • Notes: Strong choice for quick integration

5) If you want “easy integration” specifically

These are often the simplest to start with:

  1. Companies House API – best official company registry API experience
  2. OpenCorporates – broad global company lookup
  3. SEC EDGAR data – public company filings
  4. Federal Register API – regulatory monitoring
  5. CourtListener API – litigation and court research
  6. OpenSanctions – compliance/watchlist screening
  7. Socrata open-data portals – local government records at scale

6) Practical stack suggestions

If your goal is company enrichment

  • OpenCorporates + PDL + Crunchbase
  • Add Companies House for UK verification
  • Add SEC EDGAR for public-company financials

If your goal is compliance / due diligence

  • OpenSanctions + OFAC + Companies House/OpenCorporates
  • Add CourtListener and Federal Register for adverse legal/regulatory signals

If your goal is local public records

  • Socrata portals + county open-data + property vendor
  • Build a normalization layer because schemas vary a lot

7) Tips for choosing a provider

Look for:

  • REST + JSON
  • Good search endpoints
  • Pagination and bulk export
  • Clear rate limits
  • Stable identifiers for companies/people
  • Webhooks or incremental updates if available
  • Transparent licensing for data reuse

If you tell me:

  1. what kind of research you’re automating,
  2. which countries/jurisdictions, and
  3. whether you need free/open data vs paid commercial APIs,

I can narrow this to a short recommended stack and even sketch an integration architecture.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.