Prompt

I’m unhappy with Google Vertex AI embeddings for batch processing

Artificial Intelligence / AI Search1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Sorry you’re running into that. Vertex AI embeddings can be a pain for batch workflows if you need:

  • predictable throughput
  • low per-item latency
  • easy batching/retries
  • consistent output quality
  • simple cost control

If you want, I can help in a few directions:

  1. Diagnose the problem
    Tell me what’s going wrong:

    • slow batch jobs
    • rate limits / quota errors
    • inconsistent embeddings
    • high cost
    • bad semantic search quality
    • awkward API/batching behavior
  2. Optimize Vertex AI usage
    I can suggest:

    • batching strategy
    • concurrency settings
    • retry/backoff patterns
    • chunk sizing
    • quota tuning
    • storage/queue patterns for large jobs
  3. Suggest alternatives
    Depending on your needs, I can compare Vertex AI against:

    • OpenAI embeddings
    • Cohere
    • Hugging Face / local models
    • Jina / Voyage / Mistral embeddings
  4. Design a batch pipeline
    I can sketch a robust architecture for:

    • millions of documents
    • incremental updates
    • idempotent retries
    • vector DB ingestion
    • monitoring and failure recovery

If you share:

  • your document volume
  • embedding model you’re using
  • batch size
  • throughput target
  • what specifically feels bad

…I can give a concrete recommendation.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.