Prompt
I’m unhappy with Google Vision OCR because it misses tables and key-value pairs
Latest observation
Oct 11, 2026
OpenAI APIWeb search: off
That’s a common pain point. Google Vision OCR is decent for plain text, but it’s not the best choice when you need document structure like:
- tables
- key-value pairs
- form fields
- reading order
- layout-aware extraction
Better options to consider
1. Google Document AI
If you want to stay in the Google ecosystem, this is usually the right upgrade.
- Better at layout analysis
- Has processors for forms, invoices, receipts, tables
- Can return structured output, not just raw OCR text
2. AWS Textract
Very strong for:
- tables
- forms / key-value pairs
- scanned documents
If your documents are business forms or invoices, Textract is often better than plain OCR.
3. Azure Document Intelligence (Form Recognizer)
Good for:
- structured document extraction
- forms
- tables
- custom models for your document types
4. Open-source alternatives
If you want control and lower cost:
- PaddleOCR + PP-Structure
- LayoutParser
- docTR
- Tesseract plus layout tools, though this is usually weaker for tables/forms
Practical recommendation
If your main issue is missing tables and key-value pairs, don’t use generic OCR alone. Use a document AI / layout extraction tool instead.
A good decision rule:
- Simple text images → OCR is fine
- Forms, invoices, tables, receipts → Document AI / Textract / Azure Document Intelligence
- Custom pipeline / self-hosted → PaddleOCR + layout analysis
If you want, I can help you with one of these:
- compare Google Document AI vs Textract vs Azure
- suggest the best option based on your document type
- give you a sample pipeline for extracting tables and key-values
If you share what kind of documents you’re processing, I can recommend the best tool more precisely.