Prompt

I'm unhappy with LangChain because my agent setup feels too complex, what else should I try?

Artificial Intelligence / AI Agents1 observationLast seen Oct 9, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 9, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If LangChain feels too heavy, that’s a common sign to simplify the stack. What to try next depends on what you’re actually using it for:

If you want the simplest possible path

  • Use the OpenAI API / Responses API directly
    • Great if you mostly need: prompt → model → parse output → maybe a couple tool calls.
    • You’ll write a bit more glue code, but it’s usually much easier to reason about than a full agent framework.

If you still want agent/tool orchestration, but lighter than LangChain

  • LlamaIndex
    • Often better if your main need is RAG / data retrieval rather than general-purpose agents.
    • Its abstractions can still get complex, but it’s often more focused and less sprawling for retrieval-heavy apps.
  • Semantic Kernel
    • Good if you want a more structured “skills/tools/plugins” style.
    • Can feel cleaner for enterprise-y workflows, especially in .NET, but works elsewhere too.
  • Haystack
    • Strong choice for search/RAG pipelines.
    • More opinionated and sometimes easier to understand than LangChain for document-centric apps.

If you want agents, but with more control and less magic

  • Hand-roll your own agent loop
    • For many use cases, a few functions are enough:
      • call model
      • inspect tool request
      • run tool
      • feed result back
    • This is often the best option if your workflow is simple or you care about debuggability.

If you want a more modern “agent workflow” framework

  • AutoGen
    • Good for multi-agent conversation patterns.
    • Better if you explicitly want agents talking to agents, but can be overkill for basic tool use.
  • CrewAI
    • Focuses on role-based multi-agent workflows.
    • Easier to start with than some frameworks, but still another abstraction layer.

Practical recommendation

If your setup feels too complex, I’d usually suggest:

  1. If it’s just tool calling + some business logic: use the model API directly
  2. If it’s retrieval-heavy: try LlamaIndex or Haystack
  3. If you really need agents: try Semantic Kernel or AutoGen
  4. If simplicity/debuggability matters most: build the orchestration yourself

A good rule of thumb

If you can describe your workflow in one sentence and it involves only a few steps, a framework may be adding more complexity than value.

If you want, I can help you choose based on your exact use case — for example:

  • RAG over documents
  • function/tool calling
  • multi-agent collaboration
  • chatbots with memory
  • workflow automation

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.