Prompt

I’m unhappy with PageSpeed Insights because it’s too limited, what should I use?

Technology / SEO & AEO Tools1 observationLast seen Oct 21, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 21, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

If you want more than PageSpeed Insights, the best replacement depends on what you’re trying to measure. PSI is useful, but it’s really just one view of performance and it can feel “too narrow” because it focuses heavily on Lighthouse + CrUX data.

Here are better options by use case:

Best all-around alternatives

  • WebPageTest
    Great for deep performance debugging. Lets you choose device, connection speed, location, filmstrips, waterfalls, and repeat tests. Best if you want to understand why a page is slow.

  • Lighthouse in Chrome DevTools
    Good for local, repeatable audits. More practical for development than PSI because you can test changes immediately and inspect the page directly.

  • GTmetrix
    Easier-to-read reports, waterfall charts, and monitoring. Good if you want a friendlier UI than WebPageTest.

Best for real-user data and ongoing monitoring

  • SpeedCurve
    Excellent for performance monitoring over time, especially for teams. Strong on real-user monitoring and budgets, but it’s paid.

  • New Relic / Datadog / Akamai mPulse / Elastic RUM
    Better if you want performance tied to backend/app observability and real-user metrics at scale.

Best if you want lab + field data in one place

  • DebugBear
    Strong mix of synthetic testing and real-user monitoring, with good debugging and alerting.

  • Calibre
    Good performance monitoring with budgets and alerts, nice for teams.

Best open-source / DIY

  • Lighthouse CI
    Automate Lighthouse in your pipeline and track regressions.
  • WebPageTest API
    If you want to build your own performance workflow.
  • sitespeed.io
    Very powerful, especially if you want command-line automation and custom metrics.

My practical recommendation

If you’re unhappy with PSI, I’d usually suggest:

  1. WebPageTest for deep analysis
  2. Lighthouse in DevTools / Lighthouse CI for development and regression checks
  3. SpeedCurve or DebugBear if you want ongoing monitoring

If you want, I can recommend the best tool for your specific situation:

  • solo dev vs team
  • free vs paid
  • lab testing vs real-user monitoring
  • website vs app
  • SEO/performance reporting vs engineering debugging

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.