Prompt

I'm unhappy with pgvector for large-scale embeddings

Technology / Databases1 observationLast seen Oct 7, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 7, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Totally fair — pgvector is convenient, but it’s not usually the best choice once you get into large-scale embedding workloads.

Common pain points:

  • Index build / rebuild times get painful as vectors grow
  • Query latency can become inconsistent at higher scale
  • Postgres operational overhead rises because you’re forcing a search workload into an OLTP database
  • Memory / vacuum / bloat / replication concerns can show up
  • Tuning HNSW / IVFFlat in Postgres is less flexible than dedicated vector systems

If your goal is large-scale vector search, better options are usually:

Managed vector databases

  • Pinecone – simplest for production semantic search
  • Weaviate – good hybrid search + filtering
  • Qdrant – strong OSS + managed option, good filtering
  • Milvus – built for scale, common for very large deployments

Search engines with vector support

  • OpenSearch / Elasticsearch – useful if you already need keyword + vector hybrid search
  • Good when retrieval needs combine structured filters, full-text, and vectors

Specialized infra

  • FAISS – great for DIY / offline / custom systems
  • Often used when you can manage your own indexing and serving layer

When pgvector is still okay

It’s fine if:

  • your corpus is relatively small or medium-sized
  • you want simplicity and everything in Postgres
  • you need transactional consistency tightly coupled with app data
  • you’re still prototyping

A practical rule of thumb

If:

  • you’re over hundreds of thousands to millions of vectors,
  • need low-latency search,
  • and vector search is becoming a core workload,

then moving off pgvector is often the right call.

A good migration pattern

A lot of teams do:

  1. Keep Postgres as the source of truth
  2. Replicate embeddings to a dedicated vector store
  3. Use Postgres for metadata and joins
  4. Use the vector DB for ANN retrieval
  5. Optionally rerank in app or search layer

If you want, I can help you choose between Pinecone vs Qdrant vs Milvus vs OpenSearch based on:

  • corpus size
  • QPS
  • filtering needs
  • budget
  • cloud/on-prem requirements

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.