Prompt

I'm unhappy with Redis for storing embeddings

Technology / Databases1 observationLast seen Oct 7, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 7, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

That’s a common feeling. Redis can work for embeddings, but it often becomes awkward or expensive once you need:

  • large-scale vector search
  • better filtering / metadata querying
  • lower memory cost
  • more predictable retrieval quality
  • persistence and ops simplicity

A few better alternatives, depending on what you want:

If you want a dedicated vector database

  • Qdrant — strong filtering, easy to use, good open-source option
  • Milvus — very scalable, more operationally heavy
  • Weaviate — good feature set, schema/metadata support
  • Pinecone — managed, convenient, usually the fastest path to production

If you want to stay in Postgres

  • pgvector — great if your dataset is moderate and you already use Postgres
  • Works well when you need SQL + vectors + metadata in one place

If you want fast local / embedded search

  • FAISS — excellent for in-process similarity search
  • Good for prototypes or services where you manage persistence yourself

If you want search + vectors together

  • Elasticsearch / OpenSearch — useful if hybrid keyword + vector search matters

If your main issue is Redis specifically

Redis is often not ideal when:

  • embeddings are large
  • the dataset grows a lot
  • you need complex filtering
  • you want cheaper storage per vector

It can still be fine for:

  • smallish datasets
  • caching recent vectors
  • low-latency ephemeral workloads

If you want, I can help you choose a replacement based on:

  1. dataset size
  2. query pattern
  3. whether you need metadata filters
  4. budget / managed vs self-hosted
  5. latency requirements

If you give me those, I can recommend the best option pretty directly.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.