Prompt

I'm unhappy with Sentry because it only catches some errors

Technology / Observability1 observationLast seen Sep 30, 2026

Latest observation

Sep 30, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

That’s a common frustration. Sentry is good for capturing exceptions that actually get thrown and reach its instrumentation, but it won’t catch everything by default.

Why Sentry may only catch “some” errors

Common reasons:

  • Errors are handled/caught before they bubble up
  • Async errors aren’t wired up correctly
  • Frontend errors happen outside supported hooks
  • Server crashes / fatal errors happen before Sentry flushes
  • Sampling / filtering is dropping events
  • Network issues prevent events from being sent
  • Logging-only problems aren’t exceptions, so Sentry never sees them
  • Background jobs / workers aren’t integrated

What to do

1) Make sure you’re capturing more than uncaught exceptions

Depending on your stack, add:

  • manual captureException(err)
  • captureMessage("...") for non-exception failures
  • middleware/error handlers
  • global handlers like:
    • window.onerror
    • unhandledrejection
    • process-level handlers in Node

2) Check async paths

A lot of “missing” errors are in:

  • promises
  • timers
  • event handlers
  • job queues
  • fetch/API error handling

3) Verify Sentry setup

Look for:

  • dsn correctness
  • environment / release
  • beforeSend filters
  • sampling settings
  • integrations enabled
  • flushing before process exit

4) Don’t rely on Sentry alone

For “catch everything” visibility, pair it with:

  • structured logs
  • centralized log aggregation
  • APM/tracing
  • alerting on error rates
  • health checks / crash monitoring

If you want, I can help you diagnose the gap

If you share:

  • your stack (React, Node, Python, etc.)
  • one example of an error Sentry misses
  • how you initialize Sentry

…I can tell you exactly why it’s not being captured and how to fix it.

Brands

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.