Prompt

multi tenant email sending API

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 4, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 4, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Here’s a solid blueprint for a multi-tenant email sending API.

1) Core goal

Let multiple customers/tenants send email through one shared platform while keeping:

  • isolation of data and sending limits
  • per-tenant configuration like domains, templates, rate limits, SMTP/provider credentials
  • tracking and observability per tenant
  • secure authentication/authorization

2) Main API resources

Tenants

Represents a customer/account.

  • tenant_id
  • name
  • status
  • limits/quota
  • default sender settings

Sender identities

Verified email addresses or domains per tenant.

  • sender_id
  • tenant_id
  • email/domain
  • verification status
  • provider config

Templates

Reusable email content.

  • template_id
  • tenant_id
  • subject/body
  • variables schema
  • versioning

Messages

An email send request.

  • message_id
  • tenant_id
  • recipients
  • subject/body/template reference
  • status: queued/sent/failed/delivered/bounced
  • metadata

Webhooks/events

Delivery status and engagement notifications.

  • event_id
  • tenant_id
  • message_id
  • event type
  • payload

3) Suggested endpoints

Auth / tenant context

  • POST /v1/auth/token
  • GET /v1/tenants/me

Send email

  • POST /v1/emails
{
  "tenant_id": "ten_123",
  "from": "no-reply@example.com",
  "to": ["user@example.com"],
  "subject": "Welcome",
  "text": "Hello!",
  "html": "<p>Hello!</p>",
  "tags": ["welcome"],
  "metadata": {
    "user_id": "u_456"
  }
}

Send using template

  • POST /v1/emails/send-template
{
  "tenant_id": "ten_123",
  "template_id": "tpl_789",
  "to": ["user@example.com"],
  "variables": {
    "first_name": "Sam"
  }
}

Template management

  • POST /v1/templates
  • GET /v1/templates
  • GET /v1/templates/{id}
  • PUT /v1/templates/{id}
  • DELETE /v1/templates/{id}

Sender/domain verification

  • POST /v1/senders
  • POST /v1/senders/{id}/verify
  • GET /v1/senders

Message status

  • GET /v1/emails/{message_id}
  • GET /v1/emails?tenant_id=...

Webhooks

  • POST /v1/webhooks
  • GET /v1/webhooks
  • Events:
    • email.queued
    • email.sent
    • email.delivered
    • email.opened
    • email.clicked
    • email.bounced
    • email.complained
    • email.failed

4) Multi-tenant design choices

Tenant isolation

Choose one:

  1. Shared DB, tenant_id column
    • simplest, cheapest
    • enforce row-level security carefully
  2. Shared DB + separate schema per tenant
    • more isolation
    • more operational complexity
  3. Separate database per tenant
    • strongest isolation
    • expensive and harder to maintain

For most SaaS systems: shared DB + tenant_id + strict authorization works well.

Authentication

Use:

  • API keys per tenant, or
  • OAuth2/JWT with tenant claims

Example JWT claims:

{
  "sub": "service_user_123",
  "tenant_id": "ten_123",
  "roles": ["email_sender"]
}

Rate limiting

Per tenant:

  • requests/minute
  • emails/day
  • recipients/minute

Quotas

Track:

  • monthly send volume
  • bounce rate
  • complaint rate
  • suppressed recipients

5) Sending flow

  1. Client authenticates
  2. API validates tenant and sender identity
  3. API validates content and recipient list
  4. API stores message as queued
  5. Worker picks up message
  6. Worker sends via email provider
  7. Status callbacks/webhooks update message lifecycle

Use a queue like:

  • SQS
  • RabbitMQ
  • Kafka
  • Redis queue

6) Important operational features

Idempotency

Prevent duplicate sends:

  • support Idempotency-Key header
  • store request hash + result

Suppression list

Do not send to:

  • unsubscribed users
  • bounced addresses
  • complaint addresses

Delivery tracking

Use provider webhooks to sync events back to your API.

Security

  • encrypt API keys/secrets
  • sign webhooks
  • validate tenant ownership on every resource
  • audit logs for sends and config changes

7) Minimal database tables

tenants

  • id
  • name
  • status
  • created_at

tenant_api_keys

  • id
  • tenant_id
  • key_hash
  • last_used_at
  • revoked_at

sender_identities

  • id
  • tenant_id
  • type
  • value
  • verified_at

templates

  • id
  • tenant_id
  • name
  • subject
  • html
  • text
  • version

email_messages

  • id
  • tenant_id
  • from_address
  • subject
  • body_html
  • body_text
  • status
  • provider_message_id
  • created_at

email_recipients

  • id
  • message_id
  • email
  • status

email_events

  • id
  • tenant_id
  • message_id
  • event_type
  • payload
  • created_at

8) Example response

{
  "message_id": "msg_001",
  "tenant_id": "ten_123",
  "status": "queued",
  "created_at": "2026-10-04T12:00:00Z"
}

9) Recommended extras

  • sandbox/test mode
  • attachment support
  • bulk send endpoints
  • template preview/render endpoint
  • domain reputation monitoring
  • per-tenant analytics dashboard

If you want, I can turn this into:

  1. an OpenAPI spec,
  2. a database schema, or
  3. a Node.js / FastAPI implementation.

Brands

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.