Prompt

need to store and query embeddings with tenant permissions

Artificial Intelligence / AI Search1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

To store and query embeddings with tenant permissions, the key requirement is to enforce multi-tenant isolation at the storage/query layer, not just in application code.

Recommended approach

1) Add tenant metadata to every embedding

Store each vector with at least:

  • tenant_id
  • document_id / item_id
  • optional user_id, group_id, visibility, created_at

This lets you filter results so a tenant only searches their own data.

2) Enforce access control before vector search

Before running similarity search:

  • authenticate the caller
  • determine allowed tenant(s)
  • inject a mandatory filter like:
    • tenant_id = :current_tenant
    • or tenant_id IN (:allowed_tenants)

Never rely on the client to send the tenant filter.

3) Use a vector database or database with metadata filtering

Good options:

  • Postgres + pgvector: simple, strong security, easy tenant filtering with SQL/RLS
  • Pinecone / Weaviate / Qdrant / Milvus: support payload/metadata filters
  • Elasticsearch/OpenSearch kNN: also supports filters

Best pattern: row-level security + vector search

If you use Postgres + pgvector, you can combine:

  • embeddings in a table
  • tenant column
  • Row Level Security (RLS) for hard isolation

Example table:

CREATE TABLE embeddings (
  id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  tenant_id UUID NOT NULL,
  document_id UUID NOT NULL,
  embedding vector(1536) NOT NULL,
  content ტექxt,
  created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT now()
);

Query:

SELECT id, document_id, content
FROM embeddings
WHERE tenant_id = $1
ORDER BY embedding <-> $2
LIMIT 10;

With RLS, even if a query is buggy, the DB still blocks unauthorized rows.


If you need per-user permissions, not just per-tenant

Add an ACL layer:

Option A: document ACL table

CREATE TABLE embedding_acl (
  embedding_id BIGINT REFERENCES embeddings(id),
  user_id UUID,
  role TEXT, -- owner/viewer/editor
  PRIMARY KEY (embedding_id, user_id)
);

Then filter with joins before vector ordering.

Option B: group-based access

Store:

  • tenant_id
  • group_id
  • visibility

Then query only embeddings visible to the caller’s groups.


Important security rules

  • Keep tenant_id server-controlled
  • Use parameterized queries
  • Apply filtering before or during vector ranking
  • Don’t return raw embeddings to clients unless needed
  • Log access for auditing

Example architecture

  1. User authenticates
  2. API gets tenant_id and permissions from JWT/session
  3. Query service searches embeddings with tenant_id filter
  4. Results are ranked by similarity
  5. Optional post-filter by ACL if needed

If you want strict isolation

Best options, in order:

  1. Separate database/schema per tenant
  2. Shared DB + RLS
  3. Shared vector index + mandatory metadata filter

Separate DB/schema gives strongest isolation, but higher operational cost.


If you want, I can provide:

  • a Postgres + pgvector schema
  • a Qdrant/Weaviate/Pinecone design
  • or a sample permission-aware search API in Python/Node/Go.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.