Prompt

semantic search api for documents

Artificial Intelligence / AI Search1 observationLast seen Oct 10, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 10, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Here’s a practical design for a semantic search API for documents.

Core idea

Instead of matching keywords only, semantic search:

  1. Breaks documents into chunks
  2. Converts chunks into embeddings
  3. Stores embeddings in a vector database
  4. On query, embeds the query and finds the most similar chunks/documents

Typical API endpoints

1. Ingest documents

POST /documents

Uploads a document and indexes it for search.

Request

{
  "title": "Employee Handbook",
  "content": "Full document text here...",
  "metadata": {
    "department": "HR",
    "author": "Jane"
  }
}

Response

{
  "document_id": "doc_123",
  "status": "indexed"
}

2. Search documents

POST /search

Searches semantically across indexed documents.

Request

{
  "query": "What is the vacation policy?",
  "top_k": 5,
  "filters": {
    "department": "HR"
  }
}

Response

{
  "query": "What is the vacation policy?",
  "results": [
    {
      "document_id": "doc_123",
      "chunk_id": "chunk_9",
      "title": "Employee Handbook",
      "score": 0.92,
      "snippet": "Employees accrue 20 days of paid vacation..."
    }
  ]
}

3. Get a document

GET /documents/{document_id}

Returns document metadata and optionally full text.


4. Delete a document

DELETE /documents/{document_id}

Removes document and its vectors from the index.


Suggested architecture

Components

  • API server: FastAPI / Flask / Node.js
  • Embedding model: OpenAI embeddings, sentence-transformers, etc.
  • Vector database: Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, FAISS
  • Document storage: PostgreSQL, S3, Elasticsearch, or plain DB
  • Chunking service: splits long docs into searchable segments

Indexing flow

  1. Receive document
  2. Extract text
  3. Chunk text
  4. Generate embeddings for each chunk
  5. Store chunks + embeddings + metadata

Search flow

  1. Receive query
  2. Generate query embedding
  3. Vector similarity search
  4. Apply metadata filters
  5. Return top matches

Example FastAPI shape

from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import Optional, Dict

app = FastAPI()

class DocumentCreate(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: str
    metadata: Optional[Dict] = {}

class SearchRequest(BaseModel):
    query: str
    top_k: int = 5
    filters: Optional[Dict] = {}

@app.post("/documents")
def add_document(doc: DocumentCreate):
    # chunk -> embed -> store
    return {"document_id": "doc_123", "status": "indexed"}

@app.post("/search")
def search(req: SearchRequest):
    # embed query -> vector search
    return {
        "query": req.query,
        "results": []
    }

Useful features to include

  • Filters: by date, department, file type, tags
  • Hybrid search: combine keyword + vector search
  • Reranking: re-score top results with a cross-encoder/LLM
  • Pagination
  • Access control: per-user/per-role document permissions
  • Chunk previews: return matching snippet
  • Highlighting: show matched semantic passage

If you want a production-ready schema

I can provide:

  1. a full OpenAPI spec
  2. a FastAPI implementation
  3. a Node.js/Express implementation
  4. a design using Postgres + pgvector
  5. a design using Pinecone/Qdrant

If you want, I can generate a complete API spec next.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.