Prompt

Should I make developers the primary user of my product?

Technology / API Platforms1 observationLast seen Oct 11, 2026

Latest observation

Oct 11, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

Maybe — but only if developers are the best path to adoption, retention, and revenue for what you’re building.

A good rule:

  • Make developers the primary user if your product:

    • solves a technical workflow problem,
    • needs integration or customization,
    • benefits from API/automation,
    • is hard for non-technical users to evaluate or configure,
    • can grow bottom-up through individual adoption.
  • Don’t make developers the primary user if your product:

    • is mainly a business workflow tool,
    • requires frequent collaboration with non-technical stakeholders,
    • is bought and used by ops, sales, finance, support, etc.,
    • would be too technical for your actual buyer/user to adopt easily.

A useful distinction:

  • User = who interacts with the product daily
  • Buyer = who approves the purchase
  • Champion = who pushes it internally

In many products, developers should be the primary user, but not necessarily the buyer.

Ask yourself these 5 questions

  1. Who feels the pain most acutely?
  2. Who can adopt fastest without procurement friction?
  3. Who can evaluate the product most accurately?
  4. Who will expand usage inside the company?
  5. Who will pay for it eventually?

If developers score highest on most of those, they should likely be the primary user.

Common signs you should target developers

  • They currently use scripts, spreadsheets, or manual workarounds.
  • They already own the interface/integration layer.
  • The product becomes more valuable the more they extend it.
  • Your competitors already win by being loved by engineers.

Common signs you shouldn’t

  • The real pain is in a business process, not in implementation.
  • Developers would be gatekeepers, not users.
  • Adoption would depend on non-technical teams anyway.
  • You’d be forcing a technical persona just because it’s easier to market to them.

Practical advice

If you’re unsure, don’t commit to “developers only.” Instead:

  • make developers the entry point,
  • support the broader workflow for other users,
  • and validate whether the product expands from dev team to the rest of the org.

If you want, I can help you decide based on your product by asking a few quick questions.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.