Prompt

We're building an AI training data pipeline from public websites, what infrastructure makes sense?

Technology / Data infrastructure1 observationLast seen Sep 24, 2026

Latest observation

Sep 24, 2026OpenAI APIWeb search: off

A sensible infra stack depends mostly on scale, freshness, and compliance. For public-web training data, I’d design around a pipeline that is crawl → fetch → normalize → dedupe/filter → quality checks → store/version → export to training jobs.

1) Core architecture

A. Discovery / URL sourcing

  • Seed manager: starts from known domains, sitemaps, RSS feeds, public indexes, or curated URL lists
  • Frontier service: maintains crawl priority, politeness, recrawl schedules, and per-domain limits
  • URL deduper: prevents re-fetching the same canonical URL repeatedly

B. Crawl / fetch layer

  • Distributed fetchers running in containers or VMs
  • Use:
    • standard HTTP client for most pages
    • headless browser only when necessary
  • Politeness controls:
    • robots.txt checks
    • rate limiting per host
    • backoff / retry policies
    • user-agent and contact info
  • Proxy management if needed for reliability, but avoid anything that looks like bypassing access controls

C. Parsing / extraction

  • HTML-to-text and structured extraction
  • Preserve:
    • raw HTML snapshot
    • cleaned text
    • metadata (title, canonical URL, language, timestamp, headers)
  • Optional:
    • boilerplate removal
    • main-content extraction
    • language detection
    • document type classification

D. Quality / safety filters

  • Deduplication
    • exact dedupe via hashes
    • near-dedupe via SimHash/MinHash
  • Content filtering
    • spam, templated pages, low-text pages
    • adult content, malware, profanity, etc. depending on policy
  • PII detection/redaction
  • Copyright/licensing metadata tagging
  • Domain reputation / allowlist / blocklist
  • Model training suitability scoring

E. Storage / dataset layer

Use multiple stores:

  • Object store for raw crawl artifacts and parsed documents
    • S3/GCS/Azure Blob or on-prem equivalent
  • Metadata DB for crawl state and document metadata
    • Postgres for simpler setups
    • DynamoDB/Cassandra/Bigtable for very large frontier state
  • Search/index for debugging and review
    • OpenSearch/Elasticsearch
  • Warehouse/lakehouse for analytics and dataset builds
    • Iceberg/Delta Lake/Hudi on object storage

F. Dataset build / export

  • Build versioned dataset snapshots:
    • train / validation / test splits
    • source-domain-balanced subsets
    • language or topic slices
  • Export to:
    • Parquet / JSONL
    • sharded object-store files
    • manifest files for training jobs
  • Track dataset lineage:
    • source crawl version
    • filters used
    • hashes
    • transform code version

2) Recommended infrastructure patterns

Small-to-medium scale

If you’re just getting started:

  • Kubernetes for fetchers and processors
  • Postgres for crawl state and metadata
  • S3-compatible object storage for raw and processed docs
  • Airflow or Dagster for orchestration
  • Spark or Ray for batch processing
  • OpenSearch for indexing/debugging

This is a good balance of simplicity and flexibility.

Large scale

If you’re crawling millions to billions of pages:

  • Kubernetes + autoscaling workers
  • Kafka/PubSub/SQS for URL/task queues
  • Redis for fast frontier state / rate limiting
  • Object storage + lakehouse tables (Iceberg/Delta)
  • Trino/Presto/Spark/Ray for large-scale processing
  • Feature flags/config service for filter policy changes
  • Strong observability: Prometheus, Grafana, Loki/ELK, OpenTelemetry

3) Key services to include

Frontier manager

Responsibilities:

  • normalize URLs
  • schedule recrawls
  • enforce politeness and per-site quotas
  • prioritize important domains/pages
  • maintain crawl status

Document processing workers

Responsibilities:

  • fetch page
  • extract text and metadata
  • classify content
  • compute hashes
  • emit structured records

Policy engine

Rules such as:

  • block/allow domains
  • accept only certain content types
  • reject login-gated / paywalled / robots-blocked content
  • PII/redaction settings
  • retention rules

Lineage and audit system

Track:

  • source URL
  • fetch time
  • headers and content hash
  • processing steps
  • dataset inclusion/exclusion reason

This becomes crucial when someone asks, “Why is this page in the dataset?”


4) Data model suggestion

Store each page/document as:

  • url
  • canonical_url
  • domain
  • fetch_timestamp
  • http_status
  • content_type
  • language
  • raw_html_uri
  • extracted_text_uri
  • text_hash
  • simhash
  • license_hint
  • robots_allowed
  • pii_flags
  • quality_score
  • filter_decisions
  • crawl_job_id
  • pipeline_version

5) Operational concerns

Cost control

  • avoid headless browser use unless necessary
  • compress artifacts
  • keep raw + processed tiers
  • de-duplicate aggressively
  • recrawl only valuable pages

Reliability

  • idempotent processing
  • retry with jitter
  • checkpointing
  • dead-letter queues
  • per-domain circuit breakers

Observability

Track:

  • fetch success rates
  • bytes downloaded
  • pages/sec per worker
  • extraction failure rates
  • content filter rejection rates
  • duplicate rates
  • domain-level throttling stats

Governance/compliance

For public websites, make sure the system supports:

  • robots.txt compliance
  • honoring site policies where required
  • takedown handling
  • provenance tracking
  • jurisdiction-aware retention controls
  • review of sensitive content sources

6) A pragmatic default stack

If I had to pick a practical starting stack:

  • Kubernetes for compute
  • Kafka or SQS/PubSub for queues
  • Postgres for metadata and crawl frontier
  • S3 + Parquet for artifacts and dataset shards
  • Airflow/Dagster for orchestration
  • Spark or Ray for batch extraction/dedup/filtering
  • OpenSearch for inspection
  • Prometheus/Grafana for metrics
  • Great Expectations or custom checks for data validation
  • Iceberg if you want table versioning and reproducible dataset snapshots

7) If you want the simplest viable system

A very lean version:

  • one queue
  • one crawler service
  • one parser service
  • one object store
  • one metadata DB
  • one orchestration tool
  • one dataset builder

That’s often enough to prove the workflow before scaling.

If you want, I can also propose:

  1. a reference architecture diagram,
  2. a cloud-native stack on AWS/GCP/Azure, or
  3. a minimal MVP design for your first 90 days.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (1 observation for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.