We’re tired of maintaining bespoke enterprise auth integrations. What are our options?

You generally have four paths, depending on how much control vs. maintenance burden you want to keep:

1) Build/keep bespoke integrations

Best when: you have a small number of large customers, very unusual auth requirements, or strict security/compliance constraints.
Pros: maximum control, tailored UX, no vendor lock-in.
Cons: highest ongoing maintenance, more support burden, every customer variation becomes a project.

2) Use a general-purpose identity provider (IdP) / SSO platform

Examples: Okta, Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD), Ping, OneLogin, Auth0, JumpCloud
Best when: most customers want standard SAML, OIDC, SCIM flows.
Pros: reduces custom work, supports common enterprise auth patterns, easier to scale.
Cons: you still need to handle edge cases, metadata quirks, tenant mapping, SCIM provisioning differences, and customer-specific rollout.

3) Use an enterprise SSO/auth automation layer

These products sit between your app and customer IdPs and aim to unify integrations/management.
Best when: you want to support many enterprise customers without building each integration yourself.
Pros: can abstract SAML/OIDC/SCIM setup, help with connection lifecycle, testing, and monitoring.
Cons: another vendor in the stack; may not cover every custom workflow.

4) Outsource to a managed services / implementation partner

Best when: auth isn’t core to your product, and you want less engineering ownership.
Pros: reduced internal burden, faster initial rollout.
Cons: ongoing costs, dependency on a partner, less direct control over product experience.

---

What most teams standardize on

If you’re supporting enterprise customers, the usual “least painful” baseline is:

• SSO: SAML 2.0 and/or OIDC
• Provisioning/deprovisioning: SCIM 2.0
• Admin controls: role mapping, group mapping, JIT provisioning
• Auditability: login logs, SCIM event logs, supportable troubleshooting

---

How to choose quickly

Ask:

1. How many enterprise customers require custom auth today?
2. Are they mostly asking for standard SSO + SCIM, or truly custom logic?
3. Do you need to support multiple IdPs per tenant?
4. How much security/compliance evidence do you need to own?
5. Is auth a differentiator for your product, or plumbing?

---

Practical recommendation

If your pain is “too many bespoke integrations,” the usual move is:

• Standardize on SAML/OIDC + SCIM
• Add a single abstraction layer in your app
• Choose a vendor or partner for the long tail of enterprise setup
• Reserve bespoke work only for true outliers

If you want, I can help you compare specific options for your situation:

• buy vs build
• which vendor category fits
• what architecture to use
• a migration plan from bespoke integrations