Prompt

What are the best datasets for natural language processing?

Technology / Data Infrastructure5 observationsLast seen Aug 31, 2026

Latest observation

Aug 31, 2026Perplexity

The “best” NLP datasets depend on your task, but there’s a well-established core set that powers most modern models and benchmarks. Below are the most widely used, high-quality datasets by category.


1. General-purpose language modeling & pretraining

These are used to train or fine-tune large language models.

Common Crawl

  • What: Massive web crawl (petabytes of raw HTML/text).
  • Use: Foundation for many LLMs (e.g., variants of LLaMA, Falcon, etc.).
  • Pros: Enormous scale, diverse domains.
  • Cons: Noisy, requires heavy cleaning and filtering.

C4 (Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus)

  • What: Cleaned version of Common Crawl used for T5.
  • Use: Pretraining encoder–decoder and decoder-only models.
  • Pros: Well-documented cleaning pipeline; widely benchmarked.

The Pile

  • What: 800+ GB curated corpus from 22 sources (books, code, web, academic papers, etc.).
  • Use: Pretraining and analysis of LLMs.
  • Pros: Diverse, well-documented sources; good for research reproducibility.

RedPajama

  • What: Open reproduction of LLaMA-style pretraining data (Common Crawl + code + books + etc.).
  • Use: Training open LLMs with transparent data.

DOLMA, FineWeb, RefinedWeb

  • What: Newer, heavily filtered web corpora designed for high-quality LLM training.
  • Use: State-of-the-art open LLM pretraining.

2. Text classification & sentiment

IMDB Reviews

  • Task: Binary sentiment classification (positive/negative).
  • Size: 50k movie reviews.
  • Use: Classic benchmark for sentiment analysis.

Amazon Reviews / Amazon Polarity

  • Task: Sentiment / star-rating prediction.
  • Use: Large-scale sentiment and rating prediction.

AG News

  • Task: News topic classification (World, Sports, Business, Sci/Tech).
  • Use: Short-text classification benchmark.

Yelp Review Polarity / Full

  • Task: Sentiment (binary) and rating prediction from reviews.
  • Use: Large-scale sentiment and rating tasks.

SST (Stanford Sentiment Treebank)

  • Task: Fine-grained sentiment (very negative → very positive) with phrase-level annotations.
  • Use: Sentiment at sentence and phrase level; tree-structured models.

3. Question answering (QA)

SQuAD (1.1 & 2.0)

  • Task: Extractive QA on Wikipedia paragraphs.
  • SQuAD 2.0 adds unanswerable questions.
  • Use: Core benchmark for extractive QA models.

Natural Questions (Google)

  • Task: Real Google search queries with long/short answers from Wikipedia.
  • Use: Open-domain QA, retrieval-augmented models.

HotpotQA

  • Task: Multi-hop QA requiring reasoning over multiple documents.
  • Use: Multi-hop reasoning, explainability.

TriviaQA, WebQuestions, MS MARCO QA

  • Task: Open-domain QA from web/search logs.
  • Use: Large-scale QA, retrieval + reading.

DROP

  • Task: QA requiring discrete reasoning (counting, sorting, arithmetic).
  • Use: Numerical and logical reasoning in QA.

4. Summarization

CNN/DailyMail

  • Task: News article → multi-sentence summary.
  • Use: Abstractive summarization benchmark.

XSum

  • Task: Highly abstractive summarization of BBC articles.
  • Use: Challenging abstractive summarization.

PubMed / arXiv summarization datasets

  • Task: Long scientific articles → abstract or summary.
  • Use: Long-document summarization, domain-specific models.

Multi-News, SamSum, DialogSum

  • Task: Multi-document or dialogue summarization.
  • Use: Meeting notes, conversations, multi-source summarization.

5. Named Entity Recognition (NER) & structured extraction

CoNLL-2003

  • Task: NER (Person, Location, Organization, Misc) in English and German.
  • Use: Classic NER benchmark.

OntoNotes 5.0

  • Task: Rich NER with many entity types.
  • Use: Fine-grained entity recognition.

WikiANN, MultiCoNLL

  • Task: Multilingual NER.
  • Use: Cross-lingual NER, low-resource languages.

ACE, Few-NERD, etc.

  • Task: Event extraction, fine-grained NER.
  • Use: Information extraction pipelines.

6. Natural Language Inference (NLI) & semantic similarity

SNLI

  • Task: Entailment/contradiction/neutral between sentence pairs.
  • Use: Foundational NLI benchmark.

MultiNLI

  • Task: Multi-genre NLI (spoken, written, fiction, etc.).
  • Use: Robust NLI across domains.

QNLI, RTE, MNLI-mismatched

  • Task: Variants of NLI used in GLUE/SuperGLUE.

STS Benchmark (STS-B), SICK-R

  • Task: Semantic textual similarity (score 0–5).
  • Use: Sentence embeddings, similarity models.

7. Coreference, parsing, and syntax

CoNLL-2012 (OntoNotes coreference)

  • Task: Coreference resolution.
  • Use: Mention clustering, anaphora resolution.

Penn Treebank, Universal Dependencies (UD)

  • Task: Syntactic parsing (POS, dependencies).
  • Use: Parsers, grammar-aware models, linguistic analysis.

8. Dialogue and conversational NLP

Cornell Movie Dialogs

  • Task: Movie script dialogues.
  • Use: Conversational modeling, chitchat.

DailyDialog, MultiWOZ, ConvAI2

  • Task: Task-oriented and open-domain dialogue.
  • Use: Dialogue state tracking, response generation.

PersonaChat, TopicalChat

  • Task: Open-domain dialogue with personas/topics.
  • Use: Long-term consistent chatbots.

9. Multilingual and cross-lingual datasets

XNLI

  • Task: Multilingual NLI (15+ languages).
  • Use: Cross-lingual transfer, multilingual encoders.

MLQA, XQuAD, TyDi QA

  • Task: Multilingual QA.

OPUS, WMT parallel corpora

  • Task: Machine translation.
  • Use: MT models, cross-lingual pretraining.

mC4, CC100

  • Task: Multilingual web corpora.
  • Use: Pretraining multilingual LLMs (mT5, mBERT-style).

10. Code + natural language

CodeSearchNet

  • Task: Code search, code–NL pairs across multiple languages.

CodeXGLUE, HumanEval, MBPP

  • Task: Code generation, completion, translation.
  • Use: Code LLMs, program synthesis.

The Stack, BigCode

  • Task: Large-scale code corpora.
  • Use: Pretraining code models (StarCoder, CodeLlama-style).

11. Benchmarks that combine many tasks

GLUE & SuperGLUE

  • Collections of NLI, sentiment, QA, coreference, etc.
  • Use: General NLP capability benchmarking.

BIG-bench, HELM, MMLU (mostly QA/knowledge)

  • Use: Evaluating large models across many tasks and domains.

How to choose

  • Pretraining LLMs: Common Crawl, C4, The Pile, RedPajama, DOLMA/FineWeb.
  • Sentiment/classification: IMDB, SST, Amazon, Yelp, AG News.
  • QA: SQuAD, Natural Questions, HotpotQA, DROP, MS MARCO.
  • Summarization: CNN/DailyMail, XSum, PubMed/arXiv datasets.
  • NER/IE: CoNLL-2003, OntoNotes, WikiANN.
  • NLI/semantics: SNLI, MultiNLI, STS-B.
  • Dialogue: MultiWOZ, DailyDialog, PersonaChat.
  • Multilingual: XNLI, mC4, OPUS, UD.
  • Code + NL: CodeSearchNet, The Stack, CodeXGLUE.

If you tell me your specific task (e.g., “fine-tune a small model for customer-support QA in English and Spanish”), I can suggest a minimal, high-impact set of datasets and how to combine them.

Observation history

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (5 observations for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Meta AI, Qwen.

How can brands improve their AEO?

Brands can build Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) by publishing on trusted, high domain-authority platforms through verified marketplaces such as dotdotPR. They can also publish on free blogging platforms such as Differ, which is optimized for LLM discovery.

Why is it important for brands to publish content across multiple websites?

Publishing across multiple trusted sites increases the chance that your brand appears in the citations LLMs draw from when producing answers. Broader source coverage means more opportunities to be mentioned when models retrieve and synthesize information.

Want this interpreted for your brand?

Explorer is the free public corpus. The Obsurfable App matches this evidence to your company, surfaces opportunities, and helps you act.