Prompt

What's the best way to manage multiple concurrent scraping tasks?

Latest observation

Aug 18, 2026 · OpenAI APIWeb search: off

The best way depends on your goals, but in practice the most reliable pattern is:

1) Use a task queue + worker pool

For multiple concurrent scraping jobs, don’t launch everything ad hoc in one script. Instead:

  • Queue URLs/jobs to scrape
  • Run a fixed number of workers concurrently
  • Enforce rate limits per domain
  • Add retries with backoff
  • Persist results and job status

This gives you control, fault tolerance, and easy scaling.

2) Choose the right concurrency model

For network-heavy scraping

Use async I/O if the sites are mostly HTTP requests:

  • Python: asyncio + aiohttp
  • Node.js: native async/await + fetch/axios

This is efficient for lots of simultaneous requests.

For browser-based scraping

If you need JavaScript rendering:

  • Use Playwright or Puppeteer
  • Limit browser/page concurrency carefully
  • Reuse browser instances, not a new one per URL

Browser scraping is much heavier, so keep concurrency lower.

3) Control concurrency by domain

A common mistake is flooding one site while others are idle.

Use:

  • Per-domain concurrency caps (e.g. 2–5 requests at a time per site)
  • Global concurrency caps (e.g. 20 total tasks)
  • Randomized delays if appropriate

This helps avoid blocks and reduces load.

4) Make jobs idempotent

Each scrape task should be safe to retry:

  • Deduplicate URLs
  • Store a status like pending/running/succeeded/failed
  • Save partial progress if possible

That way crashes or timeouts don’t ruin the whole run.

5) Add resilience

Include:

  • Timeouts
  • Retries for transient failures
  • Exponential backoff
  • Circuit breakers for problematic domains
  • Structured logging

6) Use persistence

Store:

  • Job queue in Redis, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, etc.
  • Scraped data in a DB or object store
  • Metadata like timestamps, error messages, attempt count

7) Scale horizontally if needed

If a single machine isn’t enough:

  • Run multiple workers across machines/containers
  • Keep the central queue shared
  • Partition workloads by domain or crawl batch

Simple recommended setup

If you want a solid general-purpose architecture:

  • Queue: Redis / RabbitMQ
  • Workers: Python asyncio or Node.js workers
  • Browser automation: Playwright with limited concurrency
  • Storage: PostgreSQL or MongoDB
  • Monitoring: logs + metrics + dead-letter queue

Rule of thumb

  • Many simple pages → async HTTP scraping
  • JavaScript-heavy pages → browser automation with low concurrency
  • Large-scale production crawling → queue + worker pool + rate limiting + retries

If you want, I can show you:

  1. a Python asyncio example,
  2. a Playwright worker pool example, or
  3. a production architecture diagram.

Observation history

See 4 earlier observations

Create a free Obsurfable account to unlock historical responses, model comparisons, and deeper brand intelligence.

How did Obsurfable measure this prompt?

Obsurfable records AI answers to buyer-style prompts in its research corpus (5 observations for this page). Metrics are distributions over observations, not a single static ranking.

Which AI systems does Obsurfable collect answers from?

OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Anthropic, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, and Meta AI.